Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Objectives To examine the efficacy and tolerability of atomoxetine (ATX) in improving cognitive performance of patients with Alzheimer dementia. Design A randomized, double-blind, placebo (PLA)-controlled, parallel-groups study, starting with a 5-33-day screening and evaluation period, followed by a 6-month treatment period. Setting Eight independent or academic outpatient clinics in the United States. Participants Male or female patients, aged 55 years and older, with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease (Mini-Mental State Examination score between 10 and 26) at baseline. Intervention ATX (25-80 mg/day) or PLA for up to 6 months, added to ongoing cholinesterase-inhibitor therapy. Measurements Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Portion (ADAS-Cog, primary measure), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change score at end point, Neuropsychiatric Inventory, and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Inventory-Activities of Daily Living Inventory total score, safety measures (secondary measures). Results Patients' (N = 92) scores on assessments of cognitive function, global clinical impression, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were not significantly different between treatment groups. Neither group showed significant changes from baseline on the primary measure of efficacy, the ADAS-Cog. The ATX group showed a significantly greater increase of heart rate, and the mean increase in diastolic blood pressure and decrease in weight differed significantly from the decrease in pressure and weight increase in the PLA group. No other clinically meaningful safety results were obtained. Conclusions Addition of ATX to ongoing cholinesterase-inhibitor therapy was generally well tolerated but did not significantly improve cognitive function.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: High

This is a trial of 92 participants. Adding atomoxetine to standard cholinesterase inhibitor therapy for 6 months did not improve cognition, global impression, or neuropsychiatric symptoms compared with placebo. This drug did not help treat Alzheimer's disease in this trial.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Mohs, R. C., Shiovitz, T. M., Tariot, P. N., Porsteinsson, A. P., Baker, K. D., & Feldman, P. D. (2009). Atomoxetine augmentation of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in patients with Alzheimer disease: 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-trial study. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181aad585

Vancouver

Mohs RC, Shiovitz TM, Tariot PN, Porsteinsson AP, Baker KD, Feldman PD. Atomoxetine augmentation of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in patients with Alzheimer disease: 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-trial study. The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry. 2009. doi:10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181aad585. PMID: 19700948.

BibTeX

@article{mohs2009-19700948,
  author  = {Mohs, R. C. and Shiovitz, T. M. and Tariot, P. N. and Porsteinsson, A. P. and Baker, K. D. and Feldman, P. D.},
  title   = {{Atomoxetine augmentation of cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in patients with Alzheimer disease: 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-trial study}},
  journal = {The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181aad585},
  pmid    = {19700948},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/jgp.0b013e3181aad585}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Adding atomoxetine to standard cholinesterase inhibitor therapy for 6 months did not improve cognition, global impression, or neuropsychiatric symptoms compared with placebo. This drug did not help treat Alzheimer's disease in this trial.

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 59 of 100.59 of 100 points earned41 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomized controlled trial. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry: journal h-index 178 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomized controlled trial (from PubMed type “Randomized Controlled Trial”)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 92 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 2 / 2 Randomized and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 59 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.1 citations a year over 19 year(s) since 2009
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 11 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Peter D. Feldman: h-index 29 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Rochester Medicine: institution h-index 953 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19700948)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Treatments from nearby years

Also tagged “trial”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “trial”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →