Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Dementia risk is influenced by biological and lifestyle factors as well as broader socioeconomic conditions; however, the extent to which socioeconomic deprivation creates structural exposures that affect cognitive aging remains unclear. In this study, we examined whether a neighborhood-level, integrative measure of socioeconomic deprivation, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), is associated with dementia diagnosis in the City of Chicago using archival data from neuropsychological evaluations from 2017-2025. We hypothesized that higher ADI would be associated with increased odds of dementia diagnosis, even after adjusting for individual-level demographic characteristics such as age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education. While ADI was associated with dementia diagnosis in partially adjusted models, this relationship was attenuated and no longer significant after accounting for individual-level factors. These findings suggest that neighborhood deprivation may not independently predict dementia risk, but instead reflects broader socioeconomic conditions, such as education, that are associated with cognitive outcomes.

Key findings

Why it matters

Neighborhood deprivation was linked to dementia diagnosis in partially adjusted models, but this link was no longer significant after accounting for individual factors like education. This suggests neighborhood deprivation may not independently predict dementia risk.

Study details

How this study scored 30/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 28 of the 92 points it could be judged on, which is 30 of 100. Total 30 of 100.28 of the 92 points we could judge = 30 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and senior author's track record, so those were left out: it earned 28 of the 92 points we could judge it on, which is 30 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (University of Chicago)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Tessa Brummel holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Chicago: institution h-index 1,769 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 28 / 92 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 92 points we could judge it on is 30 out of 100.
Total 30 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Brummel, T. (2026). Chicago ZIP Code-Linked Area Deprivation Index as a Predictor of Dementia Diagnosis. University of Chicago. https://doi.org/10.6082/bgsk1-hdy79

Vancouver

Brummel T. Chicago ZIP Code-Linked Area Deprivation Index as a Predictor of Dementia Diagnosis. University of Chicago. 2026. doi:10.6082/bgsk1-hdy79.

BibTeX

@article{brummel2026-f1f95d24,
  author  = {Brummel, Tessa},
  title   = {{Chicago ZIP Code-Linked Area Deprivation Index as a Predictor of Dementia Diagnosis}},
  journal = {University of Chicago},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.6082/bgsk1-hdy79},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.6082/bgsk1-hdy79}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →