Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective To evaluate the value of the Clock Drawing Test (CDT) in predicting cognitive deterioration over a 4-year period, independent of baseline cognitive status evaluated by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Design A preplanned analysis of data collected during the second (1991) and the third (1995) follow-up of the Italian rural cohorts of the FINE Study (Finland, Italy, the Netherlands Elderly). Subjects Of the 427 men (mean age 77.6 +/- 4.1 years; range 72-90 years) interviewed in 1991, 264 survived and were reinterviewed in 1995. The study population included 247 persons who were interviewed and received a complete cognitive evaluation in both 1991 and in 1995. Measurements Cognitive assessment in 1991 included the MMSE, the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS), and the CDT. The CDT was classified as normal or pathological, based on previously established criteria. The MMSE and the DRS were repeated in 1995. Results Independent of age and baseline MMSE, score, subjects with pathological CDT compared with normal CDT had lower MMSE scores at follow-up (P Conclusions Findings suggest that the CDT identifies older persons at high risk of cognitive decline and adds prognostic information that supplements the standard MMSE test.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study tested whether the Clock Drawing Test can predict cognitive decline in older men over four years, independent of the Mini-Mental State Examination. It suggests the Clock Drawing Test may help identify people at higher risk of cognitive decline, which is about prediction rather than treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 45 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.45 of the 96 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1996 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 2 / 4 247 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 102 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.2 citations a year over 32 year(s) since 1996
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8909348)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 45 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 45 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ferrucci, L., Cecchi, F., Guralnik, J. M., Giampaoli, S., Lo Noce, C., Salani, B., et al. (1996). Does the Clock Drawing Test predict cognitive decline in older persons independent of the Mini-Mental State Examination? The FINE Study Group. Finland, Italy, The Netherlands Elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01403.x

Vancouver

Ferrucci L, Cecchi F, Guralnik JM, Giampaoli S, Lo Noce C, Salani B, et al. Does the Clock Drawing Test predict cognitive decline in older persons independent of the Mini-Mental State Examination? The FINE Study Group. Finland, Italy, The Netherlands Elderly. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1996. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01403.x. PMID: 8909348.

BibTeX

@article{ferrucci1996-8909348,
  author  = {Ferrucci, L. and Cecchi, F. and Guralnik, J. M. and Giampaoli, S. and Lo Noce, C. and Salani, B. and Bandinelli, S. and others},
  title   = {{Does the Clock Drawing Test predict cognitive decline in older persons independent of the Mini-Mental State Examination? The FINE Study Group. Finland, Italy, The Netherlands Elderly}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {1996},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01403.x},
  pmid    = {8909348},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb01403.x}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Disparities

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →