Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Amyloid-targeted monoclonal antibody therapies have introduced a new era in the treatment of early Alzheimer disease. However, their use has increased the importance of detecting and monitoring amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) on MRI, as such findings may influence treatment continuation, dose modification, and patient safety assessment. As anti-amyloid therapies expand into routine practice, increasing surveillance MRI volumes, interreader variability, and the potential for missed subtle abnormalities have generated interest in artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support tools. A multidisciplinary panel of neuroradiologists and Alzheimer disease clinicians examined the extent of evidence supporting clinical implementation of AI-assisted ARIA detection tools, these tools' safe integration into practice, and remaining evidence gaps. The panel concluded that AI-assisted ARIA detection is likely to enhance patient safety when used as clinical decision support within a radiologist-in-the-loop framework. Panelists also noted substantial variation among commercially available tools in regulatory status, technical capabilities, and validation evidence. Moreover, they emphasized the need for further studies to assess the impact of improved detection on clinical outcomes. Overall, the panel supported conditional implementation with radiologist oversight, ongoing quality assurance, and prospective monitoring of clinical performance.

Key findings

Why it matters

A panel of experts concluded that AI-assisted detection of ARIA on MRI is likely to improve patient safety when used as decision support with a radiologist still reviewing the scans. They supported only conditional use with radiologist oversight, ongoing quality assurance, and prospective monitoring, and noted that more studies are needed to show whether better detection actually improves patient outcomes.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (American Journal of Roentgenology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 American Journal of Roentgenology: journal h-index 288 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Pudugramam Murali Doraiswamy: h-index 105 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Stanford University: institution h-index 2,684 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 17 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42747213)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Petrella, J. R., Barkhof, F., Benzinger, T. L., Cogswell, P. M., Franceschi, A. M., Sabbagh, M. N., et al. (2026). Artificial Intelligence–Based Detection of ARIA on MRI During Alzheimer Disease Therapy: Expert Opinion on Responsible Clinical Integration. American Journal of Roentgenology. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.26.35514

Vancouver

Petrella JR, Barkhof F, Benzinger TL, Cogswell PM, Franceschi AM, Sabbagh MN, et al. Artificial Intelligence–Based Detection of ARIA on MRI During Alzheimer Disease Therapy: Expert Opinion on Responsible Clinical Integration. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2026. doi:10.2214/ajr.26.35514. PMID: 42747213.

BibTeX

@article{petrella2026-42747213,
  author  = {Petrella, Jeffrey R. and Barkhof, Frederik and Benzinger, Tammie L.S. and Cogswell, Petrice M. and Franceschi, Ana Marija and Sabbagh, Marwan Noel and Salloway, Stephen and Zaharchuk, Greg and others},
  title   = {{Artificial Intelligence–Based Detection of ARIA on MRI During Alzheimer Disease Therapy: Expert Opinion on Responsible Clinical Integration}},
  journal = {American Journal of Roentgenology},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.2214/ajr.26.35514},
  pmid    = {42747213},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.26.35514}
}

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →