Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and female fertility in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease
Bani Medegan Fagla, Jason York, Amy Christensen, Cielo Dela Rosa, Deebika Balu, Christian J Pike, Leon M Tai, Irina A Buhimschi. Scientific reports, 2024-07-10
Topic: Genetics and APOE
Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a major cholesterol carrier responsible for lipid transport and injury repair in the brain. The human APOE gene (h-APOE) has 3 naturally occurring alleles: ε3, the common allele; ε4, which increases Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk up to 15-fold; and ε2, the rare allele which protects against AD. Although APOE4 has negative effects on neurocognition in old age, its persistence in the population suggests a survival advantage. We investigated the relationship between APOE genotypes and fertility in EFAD mice, a transgenic mouse model expressing h-APOE. We show that APOE4 transgenic mice had the highest level of reproductive performance, followed by APOE3 and APOE2. Intriguingly, APOE3 pregnancies had more fetal resorptions and reduced fetal weights relative to APOE4 pregnancies. In conclusion, APOE genotypes impact fertility and pregnancy outcomes in female mice, in concordance with findings in human populations. These mouse models may help elucidate how h-APOE4 promotes reproductive fitness at the cost of AD in later life.
Key findings
- In conclusion, APOE genotypes impact fertility and pregnancy outcomes in female mice, in concordance with findings in human populations.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific reports) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “transgenic”) — scores zero |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38982272) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 24 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Fagla, B. M., York, J., Christensen, A., Rosa, C. D., Balu, D., Pike, C. J., et al. (2024). Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and female fertility in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66489-w
Vancouver
Fagla BM, York J, Christensen A, Rosa CD, Balu D, Pike CJ, et al. Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and female fertility in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Scientific reports. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66489-w. PMID: 38982272.
BibTeX
@article{fagla2024-38982272,
author = {Fagla, Bani Medegan and York, Jason and Christensen, Amy and Rosa, Cielo Dela and Balu, Deebika and Pike, Christian J and Tai, Leon M and Buhimschi, Irina A},
title = {{Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and female fertility in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-66489-w},
pmid = {38982272},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66489-w}
}