Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 55 out of 100. Clinical safety

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

The Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable convened a working group to review data on amyloid imaging related abnormalities (ARIA) in response to concerns raised by the Food and Drug Administration. ARIA includes signal hyperintensities thought to represent vasogenic edema and/or sulcal effusion (ARIA-E) and signal hypointensities thought to represent hemosiderin deposits (ARIA-H). The workgroup proposed recommendations for detecting and monitoring ARIA in Alzheimer's disease clinical trials and provided directions for future research.

Key findings

Why it matters

Gives recommendations from an Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable workgroup on amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in trials of amyloid-modifying therapies.

How this study scored 55/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 5 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 4 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 52 of the 95 points it could be judged on, which is 55 of 100. Total 55 of 100.52 of the 95 points we could judge = 55 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 52 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2011 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 852 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 5 / 5 50.1 citations a year over 17 year(s) since 2011
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 25.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 4 / 4 Cited 305 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Rachel J. Schindler: h-index 27 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 13 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 21784348)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 52 / 95 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 52 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100.
Total 55 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 16 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Sperling, R. A., Jack, C. R., Black, S. E., Frosch, M. P., Greenberg, S. M., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2011). Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: Recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351

Vancouver

Sperling RA, Jack CR, Black SE, Frosch MP, Greenberg SM, Hyman BT, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: Recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351. PMID: 21784348.

BibTeX

@article{sperling2011-21784348,
  author  = {Sperling, Reisa Anne and Jack, Clifford R. and Black, Sandra E. and Frosch, Matthew P. and Greenberg, Steven Mark and Hyman, Bradley T. and Scheltens, Philip and Carrillo, María C. and Thies, William H. and Bednar, Martin M. and Black, Ronald S. and Brashear, H. Robert and Grundman, Michael and Siemers, Eric and Feldman, Howard and Schindler, Rachel J.},
  title   = {{Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: Recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2011},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351},
  pmid    = {21784348},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.05.2351}
}

Related studies in Clinical safety

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Clinical safety

See all studies in Clinical safety →