Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Lewy body dementia

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Accurate classification of neurodegenerative disorders remains a challenge in neuroscience. Using open-source electroencephalography (EEG) data, we investigated electrophysiological signatures to differentiate frontotemporal dementia (FTD) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) via complexity measures. Traditional relative band power analysis showed consistent increases in lower-frequency activity but did not distinguish the two disorders after correction. In contrast, fractal dimension and long-range temporal correlations (LRTCs) revealed distinct topographical differences: AD exhibited rostral dominance in fractal dimension, whereas FTD showed caudal dominance. Both disorders demonstrated reduced LRTCs, particularly in caudal regions, indicating disrupted large-scale neural dynamics. These findings suggest that complexity-based EEG features may offer a reliable, cost-effective tool for distinguishing neurodegenerative conditions, complementing traditional neuroimaging approaches.

Key findings

Why it matters

Complexity-based EEG features revealed distinct topographical differences between Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia, with AD exhibiting rostral dominance and FTD showing caudal dominance in fractal dimension. These findings suggest complexity-based EEG features may offer a reliable, cost-effective tool for distinguishing neurodegenerative conditions, complementing traditional neuroimaging.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (npj Aging)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Npj Aging: journal h-index 31 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 17 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 5.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 10.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 17 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Blake T. Dotta: h-index 16 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Laurentian University: institution h-index 277 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40490479)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ghassemkhani, K., Saroka, K. S., & Dotta, B. T. (2025). Evaluating EEG complexity and spectral signatures in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: evidence for rostrocaudal asymmetry. npj Aging. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-025-00243-y

Vancouver

Ghassemkhani K, Saroka KS, Dotta BT. Evaluating EEG complexity and spectral signatures in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: evidence for rostrocaudal asymmetry. npj Aging. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41514-025-00243-y. PMID: 40490479.

BibTeX

@article{ghassemkhani2025-40490479,
  author  = {Ghassemkhani, Kassra and Saroka, Kevin S. and Dotta, Blake T.},
  title   = {{Evaluating EEG complexity and spectral signatures in Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia: evidence for rostrocaudal asymmetry}},
  journal = {npj Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41514-025-00243-y},
  pmid    = {40490479},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41514-025-00243-y}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Lewy body dementia

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Lewy body dementia

See all studies in Lewy body dementia →