Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Among 3414 included individuals, the mean (SD) age was 68.8 (6.0) years and 2116 (62%) were female. Group mean IES scores were below clinically significant thresholds. Nevertheless, across genetic groups, learning an elevated amyloid result (1184 participants) was associated with higher IES (mean [SD], 10.5 [10.9]) than intermediate amyloid (482 participants; mean [SD] IES, 8.8 [9.8]), and intermediate amyloid was associated with higher scores than not-detected amyloid (1748 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.5 [8.4]). Across amyloid groups, learning APOE ε4 homozygosity (337 participants) was associated with higher mean (SD) IES (12.7 [11.6]) than heterozygosity (1609 participants; 9.1 [10.2]), and heterozygosity was associated with higher IES than noncarrier status (1468 participants; mean [SD] IES, 6.2 [8.1]). Both types of information were significant in an analysis of covariance model; no interaction effect was observed. In contrast, only biomarker disclosure was associated with differential change in concerns about AD dementia. Those with elevated amyloid showed a mean (SD) increase in concern (0.8 [3.5]), those with intermediate amyloid showed a smaller increase (0.4 [3.7]), and those with not-detected amyloid showed decreased concerns (-1.1 [4.2]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of cognitively unimpaired adults, associations with intrusive thoughts were observed to differ among genetic and biomarker subgroups; such associations were limited to biomarker subgroups for measures of perceived dementia risk.

Key findings

Why it matters

Learning an elevated amyloid result or APOE ε4 homozygosity was linked to higher short-term intrusive thoughts, though group average distress scores stayed below clinically significant thresholds. The findings concern the psychological impact of disclosure and do not address treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer disease.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,184 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 14.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jason H. Karlawish: h-index 88 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 14 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41910973)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Grill, J. D., RAMAN, R. E. M. A., Wang, S., Ernstrom, K. B., Andrews, P., Appleby, B. S., et al. (2026). Amyloid Imaging and APOE Genotype Disclosure and Short-Term Psychological Distress. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3845

Vancouver

Grill JD, RAMAN REMA, Wang S, Ernstrom KB, Andrews P, Appleby BS, et al. Amyloid Imaging and APOE Genotype Disclosure and Short-Term Psychological Distress. JAMA Network Open. 2026. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3845. PMID: 41910973.

BibTeX

@article{grill2026-41910973,
  author  = {Grill, Joshua D. and RAMAN, REMA and Wang, Shunran and Ernstrom, Karin B. and Andrews, Patricia and Appleby, Brian Stephen and Bhangu, Jaspreet S. and Dhadda, Shobha and others},
  title   = {{Amyloid Imaging and APOE Genotype Disclosure and Short-Term Psychological Distress}},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3845},
  pmid    = {41910973},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.3845}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “amyloid-beta”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-beta”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →