Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Background Few studies have investigated the psychosocial impact of APOE ε4/ε4 genotype disclosure, and none in ethnic minorities. Objective We used mixed methods to investigate immediate responses to APOE ε4/ε4 genotype disclosure among Latino residents of northern Manhattan who participated in the Información de la Enfermedad de Alzheimer para Latinos (IDEAL) Study. Methods Eleven ε4 homozygotes received their genotype and a 55% risk estimate for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) by age 85 from bilingual genetic counselors. Session recordings were transcribed and qualitative content analysis performed. One week after disclosure, distress levels were assessed through the intrusion subscale of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) and five items from the Impact of Genetic Testing in AD scale (IGT-AD) for 7/11 homozygotes, compared with participants with 0 (n = 61) or 1 (n = 47) ε4 alleles who also learned their APOE genotypes. Results Nine homozygotes were women; seven had an AD family history; age averaged 51 years. Participants with an AD family history or memory worries felt their concerns were validated; others were often surprised. Only one participant showed signs of elevated psychological distress. Responses on the IES-R intrusion subscale and IGT-AD items differed significantly from those of IDEAL participants who learned they had 0 or 1 ε4 alleles, but distress levels were low. Conclusions Among most Latinos in northern Manhattan who learned they had an APOE ε4/ε4 genotype, disclosure did not provoke elevated levels of distress.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Caro, D. D., Rodriguez, S., Uhlmann, W. R., Goldman, J. S., McCain, S., Wetmore, J. B., et al. (2026). Exploring immediate responses to APOE ε 4/ε4 genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure in Latinos. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261435633

Vancouver

Caro DD, Rodriguez S, Uhlmann WR, Goldman JS, McCain S, Wetmore JB, et al. Exploring immediate responses to APOE ε 4/ε4 genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure in Latinos. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 2026. doi:10.1177/13872877261435633. PMID: 41906765.

BibTeX

@article{caro2026-41906765,
  author  = {Caro, Daniela Diaz and Rodriguez, Sophia and Uhlmann, Wendy R. and Goldman, Jill S. and McCain, Sarah and Wetmore, John Brandon and Caban, Maria L. and Chung, Wendy K. and others},
  title   = {{Exploring immediate responses to APOE ε 4/ε4 genotype and Alzheimer's disease risk disclosure in Latinos}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877261435633},
  pmid    = {41906765},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261435633}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This small mixed-methods study of 11 Latino APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes found that only one participant showed signs of elevated psychological distress after learning their genotype and risk estimate. It concerns the psychosocial impact of risk disclosure and reports no treatment, cure, or prevention findings.

Study details

How this study scored 44/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 44 of 100.44 of 100 points earned56 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 61 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Ruth Ottman: h-index 74 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41906765)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 44 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “precursor”

1,339 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,339 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →