Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

BackgroundRecently published clinical studies suggest that blood-based biomarker tests (BBMTs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) provide value, but in the U.S., neither public nor private payers currently cover these tests.ObjectiveTo describe considerations for payer coverage of AD BBMTs that would need to be addressed to facilitate timely diagnosis and equitable patient access if clinical utility is demonstrated.MethodsWe performed a targeted literature review to characterize predictable coverage barriers for BBMTs and inform the development of an interview guide. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians, researchers, test developers, and a patient advocate and former payer (N = 12) to assess the barriers and refine the proposed key considerations for obtaining payer coverage.ResultsStakeholders noted that payers will require evidence of clinical validity and utility of BBMTs as part of their coverage determinations contingent on the specific indication for testing, with insufficient evidence for screening applications currently. Stakeholders also agreed that there are evidence gaps for use of BBMTs in patients from ethnic and racial minority communities that must be addressed. Given the shortage of memory specialists, stakeholders noted that limiting testing coverage authorization to specialists could be harmful to patients, particularly the underserved. Interviewees also agreed that patients with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage AD could benefit from earlier diagnosis to avoid progressing to moderate disease and limiting eligibility for new disease-modifying therapies.ConclusionsIf BBMTs meet criteria for clinical utility, anticipating and planning for coverage and reimbursement before widespread implementation will be critical to ensuring broad, equitable access to BBMTs.

Key findings

Why it matters

This assessment describes what payers would need to cover blood-based biomarker tests for Alzheimer's disease, noting that neither public nor private payers in the U.S. currently cover them. It reports insufficient evidence for screening applications and evidence gaps for use in ethnic and racial minority communities.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 218 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 12 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Kathryn A. Phillips: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, San Francisco: institution h-index 1,915 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40170393)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Deverka Patricia, A., Arias Jalayne, J., Lin Grace, A., Jessica, Z., & Phillips Kathryn, A. (2025). Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarker testing: A stakeholder-informed assessment of coverage considerations. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251329394

Vancouver

Deverka Patricia A, Arias Jalayne J, Lin Grace A, Jessica Z, Phillips Kathryn A. Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarker testing: A stakeholder-informed assessment of coverage considerations. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD. 2025. doi:10.1177/13872877251329394. PMID: 40170393.

BibTeX

@article{deverkapatricia2025-40170393,
  author  = {Deverka Patricia, A. and Arias Jalayne, J. and Lin Grace, A. and Jessica, Zwerling and Phillips Kathryn, A.},
  title   = {{Alzheimer's disease blood-based biomarker testing: A stakeholder-informed assessment of coverage considerations}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1177/13872877251329394},
  pmid    = {40170393},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251329394}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →