Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

The advent of disease-modifying therapies for neurodegenerative diseases may result in a growing demand for nuclear neuroimaging procedures presenting opportunities but also challenges to the nuclear medicine community. Whether capacity and expertise in Germany are sufficient to meet an increasing demand for nuclear neuroimaging is under discussion. Against this background, the Neuroimaging Working Group of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine initiated the first survey on the status of nuclear neuroimaging in Germany in 2023. 82 institutions participated in the survey: 33 practices, 15 community hospitals, 34 university hospitals. Primary findings were the following. In practices, brain scans are less frequently performed than in hospitals and are often limited to dopamine transporter SPECT. Brain PET is mainly performed in hospitals, and in community hospitals it is often restricted to FDG PET. Nevertheless, availability of amyloid PET with well-certified quality can be taken for granted. Thus, access to amyloid PET will not be a major bottleneck for new treatments of Alzheimer's disease. Adequate reimbursement and clear anchoring in clinical guidelines have the greatest potential to advance nuclear neuroimaging in Germany. Clinical dopamine transporter SPECT is largely in agreement with procedure guidelines. An area for improvement is the limited availability of MR images to avoid misinterpretation of structural/vascular lesions as nigrostriatal degeneration. The survey provides the first systematic assessment of the status of nuclear neuroimaging in Germany. It underscores the capacity of the German nuclear medicine community to meet an increasing demand for neuroimaging procedures, its adherence to procedure guidelines and identifies topics for improvement.

Key findings

Why it matters

This survey of nuclear neuroimaging in Germany found that availability of amyloid PET with well-certified quality can be taken for granted, so access to amyloid PET will not be a major bottleneck for new Alzheimer's treatments. It does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 34 of the 92 points it could be judged on, which is 37 of 100. Total 37 of 100.34 of the 92 points we could judge = 37 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and senior author's track record, so those were left out: it earned 34 of the 92 points we could judge it on, which is 37 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Freiburg: institution h-index 1,062 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 10 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40233814)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 34 / 92 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 34 of the 92 points we could judge it on is 37 out of 100.
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ralph, B., Alexander, D., Mathias, S., Josef, L. K., & Meyer Philipp, T. (2025). The Status of Neuroimaging with SPECT and PET in Germany: Results from the 1st Survey on Nuclear Neuroimaging in Germany in 2023. Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2566-1487

Vancouver

Ralph B, Alexander D, Mathias S, Josef LK, Meyer Philipp T. The Status of Neuroimaging with SPECT and PET in Germany: Results from the 1st Survey on Nuclear Neuroimaging in Germany in 2023. Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine. 2025. doi:10.1055/a-2566-1487. PMID: 40233814.

BibTeX

@article{ralph2025-40233814,
  author  = {Ralph, Buchert and Alexander, Drzezga and Mathias, Schreckenberger and Josef, Langen Karl and Meyer Philipp, T.},
  title   = {{The Status of Neuroimaging with SPECT and PET in Germany: Results from the 1st Survey on Nuclear Neuroimaging in Germany in 2023}},
  journal = {Nuklearmedizin. Nuclear medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1055/a-2566-1487},
  pmid    = {40233814},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2566-1487}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →