Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

A total of 156 patients were clinically diagnosed with dementia based on the 2011 NIA-AA criteria, regardless of specific disease etiology, and all exhibited significant brain atrophy on anatomical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), indicating neuronal injury (N+). A significant difference in mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scores was noted between the A–N+ and A+T+N+ groups. Both the A+T–N+ and A+T+N+ groups showed a significantly decrease in the plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and an increase in plasma pTau181 and GFAP levels compared with the A–N+ group [Figure 1A]. No significant differences were found between the A+T–N+ and A+T+N+ groups in terms of plasma biomarker levels, although a trend toward progressively increasing plasma pTau181 levels was observed across the A–N+, A+T+N+, and A+T+N+ groups. Further comparisons between the A–N+ and A+N+ groups, as well as the PET– and PET+ groups, revealed similar trends, with reduced plasma Aβ42/40 ratios and elevated pTau181 and GFAP levels in the A+N+/PET+ group compared with those in the A–N+/PET– group [Figure 1B, C]. No significant differences in plasma NfL, Aβ42, and Aβ40 levels among groups were observed [Supplementary Figure 1B, C, https://links.lww.com/CM9/C317]. In summary, our findings demonstrate a strong association between plasma biomarker levels—particularly the Aβ42/40 ratio and pTau181 and GFAP levels—and brain Aβ pathology, as confirmed by CSF biomarker analysis and/or AV45 PET.Figure 1: Comparison of plasma AD biomarkers and their correlation with CSF AD biomarkers, along with machine learning model performance in dementia patients. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio, pTau181, and GFAP exhibited significant correlations with multiple CSF biomarkers. Plasma Aβ42/40 ratios and pTau181 and GFAP levels were significantly correlated with various CSF biomarker levels, whereas plasma Aβ42, Aβ40, and NfL levels were not. Notably, plasma Aβ42/40 ratios showed a stronger correlation with CSF biomarker levels than either plasma Aβ42 levels or plasma Aβ40 levels alone did, suggesting that the Aβ42/40 ratio may reduce the influence from blood sample. Overall, plasma biomarker levels correlated more strongly with CSF Aβ biomarker levels than with CSF pTau levels or neuronal injury marker levels. Results showed no significant correlation, suggesting plasma biomarkers may not reliably indicate disease severity in this subgroup. The random forest model demonstrated the highest AUC (0.83) for predicting patient diagnoses. Additi

Key findings

Why it matters

In 156 patients already diagnosed with dementia, certain plasma markers (the Aβ42/40 ratio, pTau181 and GFAP) tracked with the presence of brain amyloid, while plasma NfL, Aβ42 and Aβ40 did not differ between groups. This is a diagnostic association study, not a treatment trial, so it does not show that measuring these blood markers changes or prevents disease.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Chinese Medical Journal)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Chinese Medical Journal: journal h-index 94 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 156 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Jing Gao: h-index 22 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Tsinghua University: institution h-index 1,218 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40025636)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Wang, T., Shang, L., Mao, C., Sha, L., Dong, L., Liu, C., et al. (2025). Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis among dementia patients via blood biomarker measurement based on the AT(N) system. Chinese Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000003496

Vancouver

Wang T, Shang L, Mao C, Sha L, Dong L, Liu C, et al. Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis among dementia patients via blood biomarker measurement based on the AT(N) system. Chinese Medical Journal. 2025. doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000003496. PMID: 40025636.

BibTeX

@article{wang2025-40025636,
  author  = {Wang, Tianyi and Shang, Li and Mao, Chenhui and Sha, Longze and Dong, Liling and Liu, Caiyan and Lei, Dan and Li, Jie and others},
  title   = {{Alzheimer’s disease diagnosis among dementia patients via blood biomarker measurement based on the AT(N) system}},
  journal = {Chinese Medical Journal},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1097/cm9.0000000000003496},
  pmid    = {40025636},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000003496}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “biomarkers”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biomarkers”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →