Topic: Genetics and APOE
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disease. In recent years, multiple pathway analyses of AD genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted, and provided strong support for immune pathways in AD. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease. It is reported that antirheumatic drugs had protective effect on dementia in RA patients. However, observational studies have reported a controversial inverse relationship between AD and RA. In addition, Mendelian randomization studies have also been performed to evaluate the association of RA with AD. However, these studies reported inconsistent association of RA with AD. Until now, it is still unclear that AD is a causally associated with RA. Here, we performed a Mendelian randomization study to investigate the causal association of AD with RA. We analyzed the large-scale AD GWAS dataset (74,046 individuals) and RA GWAS dataset (58,284 individuals) from the European descent. However, we did not identify any significant association of AD with RA using inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis (IVW), weighted median regression and MR-Egger regression.
Key findings
- Until now, it is still unclear that AD is a causally associated with RA.
- However, we did not identify any significant association of AD with RA using inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis (IVW), weighted median regression and MR-Egger regression.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Genetics →
Study details
- Study designmeta-analysis
- Participants74,046
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 80/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 45 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 80 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in neuroscience) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 12 / 12 | A meta-analysis pooling many studies |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 4 / 4 | 74,046 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 30258348) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 45 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 45 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 80 out of 100. |
| Total | 80 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Cai, Q., Xin, Z., Zuo, L., Li, F., & Liu, B. (2018). Alzheimer's Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00627
Vancouver
Cai Q, Xin Z, Zuo L, Li F, Liu B. Alzheimer's Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2018. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00627. PMID: 30258348.
BibTeX
@article{cai2018-30258348,
author = {Cai, Qixuan and Xin, Zhuoyuan and Zuo, Lin and Li, Fan and Liu, Bin},
title = {{Alzheimer's Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study}},
journal = {Frontiers in neuroscience},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.3389/fnins.2018.00627},
pmid = {30258348},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00627}
}