Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Using a monoclonal antibody raised against purified, native, human protease nexin-2/amyloid precursor protein, which recognizes an amino terminal epitope on the amyloid precursor protein and detects all major isoforms of amyloid precursor protein, we examined the localization of the amyloid precursor protein within Alzheimer's and aged control brains. Very light cytoplasmic neuronal amyloid precursor protein staining but no neuritic staining was visible in control brains. In the Alzheimer's brain, we detected numerous amyloid precursor protein-immunopositive neurons with moderate to strong staining in select regions. Many neurons also contained varying levels of discrete granular, intracellular accumulations of amyloid precursor protein, and a few pyramidal neurons in particular appeared completely filled with amyloid precursor protein granules. "Ghost"-like deposits of amyloid precursor protein granules arranged in pyramidal, plaque-like shapes were identified. We detected long, amyloid precursor protein-immunopositive neurites surrounding and entering plaques. Many contained swollen varicosities along their length or ended in bulbous tips. Amyloid precursor protein immunoreactivity in the Alzheimer's brain was primarily present as granular deposits (plaques). The amyloid precursor protein granules do not appear to co-localize within either astrocytes or microglia, as evidenced by double-labeling immunohistochemistry with anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein and anti-leukocyte common antigen antibodies or Rinucus cummunicus agglutin lectin. Amyloid precursor protein could occasionally be detected in blood vessels in Alzheimer's brains. The predominantly neuronal and neuritic localization of amyloid precursor protein immunoreactivity indicates a neuronal source for much of the amyloid precursor protein observed in Alzheimer's disease pathology, and suggests a time-course of plaque development beginning with neuronal amyloid precursor protein accumulation, then deposition into the extracellular space, subsequent processing by astrocytes or microglia, and resulting in beta-amyloid peptide accumulation in plaques.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Cummings, B. J., Su, J. H., Geddes, J. W., Van Nostrand, W. E., Wagner, S. L., Cunningham, D. D., et al. (1992). Aggregation of the amyloid precursor protein within degenerating neurons and dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(92)90265-4

Vancouver

Cummings BJ, Su JH, Geddes JW, Van Nostrand WE, Wagner SL, Cunningham DD, et al. Aggregation of the amyloid precursor protein within degenerating neurons and dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscience. 1992. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(92)90265-4. PMID: 1378573.

BibTeX

@article{cummings1992-1378573,
  author  = {Cummings, B. J. and Su, J. H. and Geddes, J. W. and Van Nostrand, W. E. and Wagner, S. L. and Cunningham, D. D. and Cotman, C. W.},
  title   = {{Aggregation of the amyloid precursor protein within degenerating neurons and dystrophic neurites in Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Neuroscience},
  year    = {1992},
  doi     = {10.1016/0306-4522(92)90265-4},
  pmid    = {1378573},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(92)90265-4}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 21 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 36 of 100. Total 36 of 100.21 of the 58 points we could judge = 36 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuroscience)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1992 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 1378573)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 21 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also in Biomarkers

204 studies in the library are filed under Biomarkers with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Biomarkers hub.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →