Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

In ARIC (n = 1,736, mean age 63, 58.8% female, 48.7% non-Hispanic White individuals, median follow-up 18.6 years), the dementia incidence rate was 10.4 (95% CI, 9.2-11.6) per 1,000 person-years. Compared to WMH-/ε4-, adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia were: WMH-/ε4+, 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1); WMH+/ε4-, 2.0 (95% CI, 1.4-2.7); and WMH+/ε4+, 3.2 (95% CI, 2.2-4.6). In UKB (n = 40,307, mean age 55, 52.7% female, 97.1% non-Hispanic White individuals, median follow-up 3.2 years), the dementia incidence rate was 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32-0.55) per 1,000 person-years. Adjusted HRs were: WMH-/ε4+, 2.3 (95% CI, 1.2-4.5); WMH+/ε4-, 2.1 (95% CI, 1.0-4.6); and WMH+/ε4+, 6.7 (95% CI, 3.2-13.9). WMH burden and APOE ε4 status additively increase dementia risk. These findings support the potential benefit of vascular risk management to reduce WMH and delay dementia onset, even among genetically at-risk individuals. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:656-667.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

de Havenon, A., Littig, L., Clocchiatti‐Tuozzo, S., Johnson, I. P., Constantinescu, S., Rivier, C. A., et al. (2025). Additive Effects of White Matter Hyperintensity and APOE ε4 Status on Risk of Incident Dementia in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts. Annals of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78103

Vancouver

de Havenon A, Littig L, Clocchiatti‐Tuozzo S, Johnson IP, Constantinescu S, Rivier CA, et al. Additive Effects of White Matter Hyperintensity and APOE ε4 Status on Risk of Incident Dementia in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts. Annals of Neurology. 2025. doi:10.1002/ana.78103. PMID: 41267647.

BibTeX

@article{dehavenon2025-41267647,
  author  = {de Havenon, Adam and Littig, Lauren and Clocchiatti‐Tuozzo, Santiago and Johnson, Ian P and Constantinescu, Sofia and Rivier, Cyprien A. and Huo, Shufan and Kimberly, William Taylor and others},
  title   = {{Additive Effects of White Matter Hyperintensity and APOE ε4 Status on Risk of Incident Dementia in Two Large Longitudinal Cohorts}},
  journal = {Annals of Neurology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/ana.78103},
  pmid    = {41267647},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.78103}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In two large longitudinal cohorts, white matter hyperintensity burden and APOE ε4 status each increased dementia risk, and having both raised risk further. The authors say these findings support the potential benefit of vascular risk management to reduce white matter hyperintensities and delay dementia onset, even in people genetically at risk.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 57 of 100.57 of 100 points earned43 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of Neurology)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Annals of Neurology: journal h-index 437 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,736 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Adam M. Brickman: h-index 87 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Massachusetts General Hospital: institution h-index 2,057 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41267647)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Related studies in Vascular contributions

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →