Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Drug development

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Purpose Depositions of tau fibrils are implicated in diverse neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, and precise assessments of tau pathologies and their impacts on neuronal survival are crucial for pursuing the neurodegenerative tau pathogenesis with and without potential therapies. We aimed to establish an in vivo imaging system to quantify tau accumulations with positron emission tomography (PET) and brain atrophy with volumetric MRI in rTg4510 transgenic mice modeling neurodegenerative tauopathies. Methods A total of 91 rTg4510 and non-transgenic control mice underwent PET with a tau radiotracer, 18 F-PM-PBB3, and MRI at various ages (1.8-12.3 months). Using the cerebellum as reference, the radiotracer binding in target regions was estimated as standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) and distribution volume ratio (DVR). Histopathological staining of brain sections derived from scanned animals was also conducted to investigate the imaging-neuropathology correlations. Results 18 F-PM-PBB3 SUVR at 40-60 min in the neocortex, hippocampus, and striatum of rTg4510 mice agreed with DVR, became significantly different from control values around 4-5 months of age, and progressively and negatively correlated with age and local volumes, respectively. Neocortical SUVR also correlated with the abundance of tau inclusions labeled with PM-PBB3 fluorescence, Gallyas-Braak silver impregnation, and anti-phospho-tau antibodies in postmortem assays. The in vivo and ex vivo 18 F-PM-PBB3 binding was blocked by non-radioactive PM-PBB3. 18 F-PM-PBB3 yielded a 1.6-fold greater dynamic range for tau imaging than its ancestor, 11 C-PBB3. Conclusion Our imaging platform has enabled the quantification of tau depositions and consequent neuronal loss and is potentially applicable to the evaluation of candidate anti-tau and neuroprotective drugs.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kimura, T., Ono, M., Seki, C., Sampei, K., Shimojo, M., Kawamura, K., et al. (2022). A quantitative in vivo imaging platform for tracking pathological tau depositions and resultant neuronal death in a mouse model. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05898-3

Vancouver

Kimura T, Ono M, Seki C, Sampei K, Shimojo M, Kawamura K, et al. A quantitative in vivo imaging platform for tracking pathological tau depositions and resultant neuronal death in a mouse model. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2022. doi:10.1007/s00259-022-05898-3. PMID: 35798978.

BibTeX

@article{kimura2022-35798978,
  author  = {Kimura, T. and Ono, M. and Seki, C. and Sampei, K. and Shimojo, M. and Kawamura, K. and Zhang, M. R. and Sahara, N. and others},
  title   = {{A quantitative in vivo imaging platform for tracking pathological tau depositions and resultant neuronal death in a mouse model}},
  journal = {European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging},
  year    = {2022},
  doi     = {10.1007/s00259-022-05898-3},
  pmid    = {35798978},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05898-3}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 24 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.24 of the 58 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 91 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “mouse”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 35798978)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 24 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Drug development

Also tagged “vivo-imaging”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “vivo-imaging”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Drug development

See all studies in Drug development →