Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 29 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract The growing population of people living with dementia demands innovative architectural solutions that prioritize wellbeing. Floor layouts significantly affect the quality of life for people living with dementia, but the nuances of perceived user experience remain a challenging criterion to evaluate during the early design stages. Visual sightlines are one of the key aspects for dementia-inclusive design where machine learning (ML) provides decision-support means to validate early-stage designs. In this study, an isovist-based quantification scheme is proposed to capture visual access data to evaluate the extent of compliance of floor layouts with respect to dementia design principles (DDP). The visual access quality labels are determined by the number of isovists that satisfy the visual access requirement for their respective DDPs, thereby ensuring a consistent and objective measurement of visual access. 18 unique spatial features were tested using feature filtering methods to predict visual access quality labels. The framework bridges qualitative design principles with quantitative methods, introducing a scalable approach for evaluating visual access in the context of dementia-friendly design. The ML model was evaluated using individual class output and multi-output evaluation metrics based on 7 feature inputs and 2 class outputs, achieving 84–87% accuracy on an individual class and 72% on the subset accuracy metric. The results suggest a viable pathway for developing ML support tools to provide feedback on DDP compliance at an early design stage.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study uses machine learning to evaluate floor layouts for dementia-friendly design based on visual access. It concerns building design and quality of life, not the treatment, cure or prevention of Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 29/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 29 of 100.29 of 100 points earned71 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Architectural Intelligence)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Architectural Intelligence: journal h-index 13 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Michela Turrin: h-index 19 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Delft University of Technology: institution h-index 811 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 29 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Alsaggaf, F., Eijkelenboom, A., Lugten, M., & Turrin, M. (2025). A machine learning framework for early-stage dementia-friendly architectural design evaluation using visual access metrics. Architectural Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-025-00087-2

Vancouver

Alsaggaf F, Eijkelenboom A, Lugten M, Turrin M. A machine learning framework for early-stage dementia-friendly architectural design evaluation using visual access metrics. Architectural Intelligence. 2025. doi:10.1007/s44223-025-00087-2.

BibTeX

@article{alsaggaf2025-7a2eb71e,
  author  = {Alsaggaf, Feras and Eijkelenboom, AnneMarie and Lugten, Martijn and Turrin, Michela},
  title   = {{A machine learning framework for early-stage dementia-friendly architectural design evaluation using visual access metrics}},
  journal = {Architectural Intelligence},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s44223-025-00087-2},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-025-00087-2}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →