Excluding participants with prevalent dementia, n = 1,161 individuals were included. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,161 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Among 952 participants (mean age at first neuropsychological assessment = 69±8 years, 62% women, 17% Black, 13% white, 68% Hispanic), 24% developed MCI/dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 952 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10-year average (SD) PM2.5 from death across the autopsy cohort was 8.2 (1.9) μg/m3. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 832 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
71/100
During the follow-up period, we identified a total of 617 incident neurodegenerative diseases, 301 PD and 182 AD. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 617 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
71/100
In total, 42 eligible studies were included. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We searched 122 studies, of which 90 were included in our analysis. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The search over five databases identified 898 articles, with 26 meeting the inclusion criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
176 and 131 participants developed incident frailty, as measured with the FI and TFI respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 131 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Syn positivity (synSAA+) co-occurred with T (in synSAA+ vs. synSAA-, 36% vs. 20% T+; Pp = 0.011) and with cognitive impairment (10% vs. 7% mild cognitive impairment; 10% vs. 0% dementia; p = 0.00050). synSAA+ participants' cognitive performance declined ≈ 40% faster than synSAA- for Digit Symbol Substitution, but not other tests. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 420 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Two thirds (66%) of adult child caregivers in the control condition admitted their parent to a residential care setting compared with 37% in the treatment condition. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients with dementia differ in their behavioral and psychological symptoms according to their diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or vascular dementia (VaD), requiring different symptom-management strategies. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 228 articles were screened at the title and abstract levels, and 120 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. 23 eligible studies were included in the narrative synthesis. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 228 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Interventions for family caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) incorporate diverse elements, but drivers of success are unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
20% of individuals with newly identified dementia were homebound and this group was more functionally impaired, medically complex, and socioeconomically disadvantaged as compared to the non-homebound. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 939 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of 23 892 individuals moving-in to care homes, 20 250 (84.8%) died by 31 May 2020. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 892 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among those newly diagnosed, Black and Hispanic patients encountered higher total costs compared to White patients, and ADRD patients living in the most vulnerable areas experienced the highest total costs compared to patients living in other regions. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 742,175 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of note, dramatic progress has been made in recent years in diabetes research and clinical practice, which includes approval of antidiabetic agents with novel mechanisms of action along with publication of clinical trial results with these drugs, and novel diagnostic and therapeutic devices, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and sensor augmented pumps (SAP). 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
First, sleep problems are associated with accidents and human errors. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A total of 73 731 patients with dementia and 733 653 controls (median age, 80.3 years; interquartile range, 74.9-84.6 years; 44 760 female [60.7%] and 28 971 male [39.3%]) were included in the study. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 731 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
ementia refers to a syndrome that is characterised by progressive deterioration of cognitive functions. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
As outlined in the original cohort profile,1 The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA) is a prospective cohort study designed to provide an evidence base for addressing the challenges and opportunities associated with population ageing in Ireland. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,525 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
LASI is India’s first ageing study and the world’s largest in terms of sample size, and will provide comprehensive longitudinal data for designing policies and programmes targeted toward the overall well-being of the older population. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 250 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
21% (7065) of the cohort had a record of mental illness at study entry, 25% (8300) had a record of challenging behaviour, and 49% (16,242) had a record of prescription of psychotropic drugs. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 33,016 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Mixed-effect models assessed rates of memory decline in relation to baseline plasma p-tau181, and whether plasma p-tau181 significantly predicted memory decline beyond widely available clinical and genetic data (age, sex, years of education, cardiovascular and metabolic conditions, and APOEε4 status). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 604 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Compared with the usual care clinics (12-month incidence, 213 of 1724 [12.4%]), the odds of an incident ADRD diagnosis were higher in the clinics randomized to QDRS plus PDM (12-month incidence, 355 of 2301 [15.4%]; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64) but not the clinics randomized to PDM only (12-month incidence, 134 of 1300 [10.3%]; AOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11]). 3 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 5,325 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →