The preanalytical delay has a significant impact for Aβ40 and Aβ42. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Two independently constructed %p‐tau217 plasma clocks had strong correlations with actual time measures and were consistent across the two cohorts. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 420 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This meta-analysis included cross-sectional amyloid PET scans acquired with 5 radiotracers from 49 227 participants across 53 studies from 15 countries (mean age, 71 years; 54% female, 62% cognitively impaired). 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 48 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
With the advancement of anti-amyloid treatments for Alzheimer disease, accurate assays for amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology are essential. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 431 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder that significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among diabetic patients. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The review analyzed 61 articles and identified a consistent positive correlation between physical activity and stress reduction. 5 key findings →
Participants: 61 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 799 participants (mean [SD] age, 46.2 [11.6] years; 424 women [53.1%]) randomized, 641 completed the 12-month follow-up and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 341 (n = 4 mosques) in the intervention group and 300 (n = 4 mosques) in the control group. 5 key findings →
Participants: 799 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hearing aid use was associated with a modestly lower risk of probable dementia overall (Hazard Ratios, HR, 0.91), but the association was confined to participants reporting improvements in hearing (HR 0.86), with no apparent benefit among those reporting poor improvement in hearing (HR 0.98). 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 61,089 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
52/100
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality globally, with over 20 million deaths each year. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Consensus was achieved on 28 statements. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
There were 16,708 eligible encounters during the 12-month study period (June 2022-May 2023). 5 key findings →
Participants: 236 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At baseline, there were 126 participants (106 [84.1%] women); mean (SD) age was 44.13 (12.71) years, mean years of interpreting experience was 8.57 (8.48) years, and 106 of 120 (88.3%) lived in an urban area. 5 key findings →
Participants: 126 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundIndividuals with type 2 diabetes have an increased risk of developing both vascular and Alzheimer's dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 128 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Selected clinical features may identify patients with suspected RPD who are likely to continue to decline. 2 key findings →
Participants: 248 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After expert panel review, only 50/67 patients met consensus criteria for DLB, 26/151 controls had a reduced MoCA, and 120/151 controls had a normal MoCA. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 151 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundPeriodontitis is a chronic bacterial infection that elicits systemic inflammation. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We will assess the utility of auditory perceptual tests, both alone and combined with blood-based biomarkers (pTau217 and NfL), for diagnosis and prognosis in individuals with cognitive symptoms. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 600 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In both cohorts, CSF MTBR-tau243 was associated with tau-PET temporal meta-ROI burden (BioFINDER-2: β = 1.1, p = < 0.0001 and Knight-ADRC: β = 0.7, p = < 0.0001), and this association did not differ by sex (BioFINDER-2 β = 0.04, p = 0.6 and Knight-ADRC: β = 0.009, p = 0.9). 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 446 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These analyses suggest that CenTauR harmonization increases the comparability of tau‐PET data acquired with different tracers. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,089 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Accelerated atrophy of medial temporal lobe subregions was evident already during preclinical AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 363 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Both visual read methods exhibited strong concordance with semiquantitative SUVRs. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,654 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.008). Deficits in medial temporal CVR are observed in older adults with MCI and are related to worse memory function. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The evolving composition and experiences of the family caregiver workforce have profound ramifications for public policy but are not well understood. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study included 467 caregivers. Most (92.5%) caregivers performed at least one health care interaction task. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 467 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 36 251 participants were included with a median follow-up time of 13.9 years. 5 key findings →
Participants: 251 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →