27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Further studies are warranted to develop and refine the specific MIND diet for different populations. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 224,049 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 92 383 participants, 60 582 (65.6%) were women and the mean (SD) age was 56.4 (8.0) years. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 92,383 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the cohort analyses, 891 incident dementia cases were identified over 166,762 person-years. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 207,981 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Smoking cessation was associated with a sustained lower dementia risk and slower cognitive decline, comparable to never smokers and those without short-term risk increase. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 32,802 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We conducted a systematic review of research in artificial intelligence (AI) for retinal fundus photographic images. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 13 592 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.34 [9.39] years; 7175 [52.8%] female), 6525 (48.0%) experienced possible childhood loneliness, and 565 (4.2%) reported childhood loneliness. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 592 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sepsis is a leading cause of death in critical illness, and its pathophysiology varies depending on preexisting medical conditions. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with both physical frailty and depression had the highest risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 947 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 10 974 participants (60.0% female, mean [SD] age: 73.2 [6.8] years), 2445 developed incident all-cause dementia over 116 067 person-years of follow-up. 5 key findings →
Participants: 974 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia constitutes a worldwide concern. 4 key findings →
Participants: 497,401 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Twelve studies were considered for analysis. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 535 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In comparison with participants living with others and with normal cognition, those adults living alone with cognitive impairment reported a higher percentage of catastrophic health expenditure (19.5% vs. 11.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2935 patients (50.4% women; mean age=72.2 years; 19.8% subjective cognitive impairment, 39.8% mild cognitive impairment, and 40.4% dementia), larger WMH volume within projection fibres (B=0.24, SE=0.10, p=0.013) was associated with greater apathy. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,935 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Glymphatic dysfunction is a crucial pathway for dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Superficial white matter (SWM), containing short-range association connections beneath the cortex, has been affected in mild cognitive impairment and AD, with gaps in understanding the disease's early stages. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To the Editor: The standardized management of pain–agitation–delirium (PAD) represents a fundamental component of clinical practice in intensive care units (ICUs).[1] Evidence-based analgesia and sedation strategies not only alleviate patients’ physiological discomfort and psychological distress, but also significantly reduce mechanical ventilation duration, improve long-term prognosis, and optimize healthcare resource allocation.[1,2] Equally crucial is delirium management, as evidenced by studies demonstrating that delirium duration independently predicts mortality risk, hospital stay length, healthcare expenditures, and acquired dementia incidence.[3] Although existing studies have explored PAD management practices, most rely on clinicians’ subjective recall that may distort objective clinical realities and fail to reflect distinctive characteristics.[4] Therefore, this nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study, initiated by the Critical Care Analgesia and Sedation Quality Control Subspecialty Group under the China National Center for Medical Quality Control in Critical Care Medicine, aims to investigate the current status of PAD management in China. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,627 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
China accounts for 1/5 of the global population and China faces a particularly heavy dementia burden due to its rapidly ageing population. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Mediterranean-DASH Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet has been related to a lower risk of dementia and better cognitive function. 4 key findings →
Participants: 45,906 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The underlying mechanisms of mild behavioral impairment (MBI), a marker for cognitive impairment and dementia, have remained unclear especially in a multiethnic Asian population. 4 key findings →
Participants: 305 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Among 389,314 participants, CKM stages were distributed as follows: stage 0 (10.0%), stage 1 (8.0%), stage 2 (57.6%), stage 3 (17.9%), and stage 4 (6.5%). 5 key findings →
Participants: 389,314 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It accounts for a quarter of the elderly population and is associated with cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Participants: 111 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global age-standardised DALY rates of ADRDs per 100 000 population slightly increased from 1331.59 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 881.57, 1781.61) in 1990 to 1347.24 (95% CI = 906.36, 1788.12) in 2021, with an AAPC of 0.04% (95% CI = 0.02, 0.05). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lower DTI-ALPS, lower BOLD-CSF coupling, and higher CP volume predicted dementia, but PVS volume did not. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The relative risk of dementia following cerebral hemorrhage ( relative risk(RR):3.02[1.17-7.78],P<0.001 ) was higher than that of cerebral infarction (RR: 2.07[1.47-2.96], P<0.001). 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.022). Our approach captured the complex morphological alterations of the ChP in AD. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →