28,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I2 = 95%). 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 49,227 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Across the cohorts, each 10-year increase in BAI was associated with a 39% higher risk of incident dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39 [95% CI, 1.21-1.59]; P Conclusions and relevance In this IPD meta-analysis, a higher sleep EEG-based BAI was associated with a higher risk of incident dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 7,105 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Predicting not just if, but also when, cognitively unimpaired individuals are likely to develop onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD) symptoms would be useful to clinical trials and, eventually, clinical practice. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 603 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Female participants had a lower hazard of early-onset dementia compared with males (HR 0·70 [95% CI 0·61-0·80]). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 544,442 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2556 patients (mean age 79 ± 9 years; 56% women), delirium occurred in 957 (37%). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,556 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 283,772 participants (mean [SD] age 64.62 [8.96] years; 56.7% women), 60.3% identified as non-Hispanic White and 13.3% as Hispanic/Latino. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 283,772 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Female individuals had higher plaque burden than male individuals (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.67-2.29; P Conclusions and relevance The findings indicate that female sex, APOEε4, and both race and African ancestry were jointly associated with amyloid in this study population. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,268 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Biomarkers to determine underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) tau or TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP) pathology during life are needed to advance clinical trials targeting specific FTD pathologies. 3 key findings →
Participants: 513 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Co-pathology is a common feature of neurodegenerative diseases that complicates diagnosis, treatment and clinical management. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 17,187 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
's ≥ 0.75). Both markers identified Braak stage V-VI levels with similarly high performance (entorhinal SUVR, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.92 [95% CI 0.91-0.93]; temporal meta-ROI SUVR, AUC = 0.91 [95% CI 0.90-0.92]; plasma p-tau217, AUC = 0.90 [95% CI 0.89-0.91]), but PET outperformed plasma p-tau217 in identifying high/intermediate ADNCs (entorhinal ROI, AUC = 0.94 [95% CI 0.94-0.95]; temporal meta-ROI AUC = 0.94 [95% CI 0.94-0.95]; plasma p-tau217, AUC = 0.89 [95% CI 0.88-0.90]). 2 key findings →
Participants: 56 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In 272 participants, mean (SD) age was 70 (4.5) years, 270 were male (99.3%), and 83 (30.5%) were amyloid-PET positive. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 272 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study evaluates the quantile-aggregation method using both simulated data and publicly available Alzheimer disease randomized trial data. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia diagnosis increasingly relies on blood-based biomarkers, yet their performance in diverse populations remains insufficiently characterized. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 605 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Despite differences in prevalence of APOE-ε4, its association with dementia risk was similar across Chinese, Japanese, Filipino, and non-Latino White participants. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 46,325 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Aggregation of the protein tau defines tauopathies, the most common age-related neurodegenerative diseases, which include Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Undiagnosed dementia is common and associated with increased mortality, identifying a vulnerable population missed by current diagnostic pathways. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 13,142 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia prevalence was 22%, with 35% undiagnosed. 4 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 2,003 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In vivo biomarkers for detecting neuropathologies from repetitive head impacts (RHI), including chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), are needed. 4 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 231 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In Alzheimer's disease (AD), pathological tau protein shows a progressive accumulation of post-translational modifications (PTMs), reflecting disease severity, progression, and prion-like activity. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
. Here, to gain deeper insights into the aetiology of different brain diseases, we used specimens from 1,494 unique donors to generate a population-scale single-cell transcriptomic atlas of the human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, comprising over 6.3 million individual nuclei. 1 key finding →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 822 individuals enrolled in the HEAD study, 681 participants spanning cognitively unimpaired to dementia were included. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 681 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Using human stem cell-derived neurons, we show that TDP-43 reduction induces cryptic splicing and downregulation of these genes, resulting in impaired excitability and synaptic transmission. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Three trajectory classes were identified: stable, slow decliners, and fast decliners. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Latin America’s diverse genetic landscape provides a unique opportunity to study Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). 1 key finding →
Participants: 2,162 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 5757 participants (21.7% Black, 20.3% Latinx, 58.1% AORE), we found lower odds of amyloid positivity in Black (odds ratio [OR]: 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.83) and Latinx (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91) compared to AORE. 4 key findings →
Participants: 5,757 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →