Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 52 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), pathological tau protein shows a progressive accumulation of post-translational modifications (PTMs), reflecting disease severity, progression, and prion-like activity. Although many neurodegenerative diseases with dementia display tau aggregates, the pathological proteoforms of tau protein from each disease type remain unknown. Here, using a quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics platform, FLEXITau, deep characterization of pathological tau protein isolated from the brains of 203 human subjects with AD, familial AD (fAD), chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), Pick's disease (PiD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)-a non-tauopathy symptomatic control-and healthy controls (CTR) is performed. Unsupervised data analyses and supervised machine learning identify distinct molecular features of pathological tau for each disease, enabling molecular disease stratification. This study identifies potential disease-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets for tauopathies and provides critical quantitative information for pharmacokinetic modeling required for therapeutic and disease mechanism studies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Kumar, M., Schlaffner, C. N., Tang, S., Beuvink, M. A., Viodé, A., Mair, W., et al. (2026). Molecular features of human pathological tau distinguish tauopathy-associated dementias. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.036

Vancouver

Kumar M, Schlaffner CN, Tang S, Beuvink MA, Viodé A, Mair W, et al. Molecular features of human pathological tau distinguish tauopathy-associated dementias. Cell. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.036. PMID: 41616780.

BibTeX

@article{kumar2026-41616780,
  author  = {Kumar, Mukesh and Schlaffner, Christoph N. and Tang, Shaojun and Beuvink, Maaike A. and Viodé, Arthur and Mair, Waltraud and Jha, Meenakshi and Uncu, Ceren and others},
  title   = {{Molecular features of human pathological tau distinguish tauopathy-associated dementias}},
  journal = {Cell},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.036},
  pmid    = {41616780},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2025.12.036}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

By mapping the molecular features of pathological tau across several dementias, this study identifies potential disease-specific biomarkers and therapeutic targets. It is laboratory-based and does not itself test any treatment, cure or prevention in patients.

Study details

How this study scored 52/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 6 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 52 of 100.52 of 100 points earned48 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cell)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Cell: journal h-index 1,220 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 15 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 7.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 6 / 6 Cited 62.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 15 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Judith A. J. Steen: h-index 34 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Harvard University: institution h-index 3,235 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 13 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41616780)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 52 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “phosphorylated”

733 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylated”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 733 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →