32,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Plasma phosphorylated-tau181 (p-tau181) showed the potential for Alzheimer's diagnosis and prognosis, but its role in detecting cerebral pathologies is unclear. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,189 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma p-tau biomarkers had a greater diagnostic performance and larger effect sizes compared to t-tau and Aβ42/40 assays in detecting Aβ pathology. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 197 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We analysed 461 participants from the DABNI and SPIN cohorts. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 461 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found that plasma p-tau217 was more associated with cognitive performance than p-tau181 and p-tau231 and that this relationship was particularly strong for memory scores (TRIAD: βp-tau217 = -0.53, βp-tau181 = -0.35 and βp-tau231 = -0.24; BioFINDER-2: βp-tau217 = -0.52, βp-tau181 = -0.24 and βp-tau231 = -0.29). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 103 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
(N = 558, mean age = 69.2 ± 8.8, 56.5% women) were diagnosed with AD (n = 274, considering dementia and MCI stages), frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 55), Lewy body disease (LBD, n = 40, considering MCI and dementia stages), other neurodegenerative diseases, n = 57 (e.g Supranuclear Palsy, Corticobasal syndrome), non-neurodegenerative cognitive impairment (NND, n = 79, e.g. vascular lesions, epilepsy or psychiatric disorders) or subjective cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 53). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 558 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the multivariable linear regression models, a doubling of serum molybdenum level was associated with 9.4% higher Aβ42/40 ratio (95% CI: 0.8, 18.6%; p = 0.03), and a doubling of serum cobalt level with 17.5% higher p-tau181 level (95% CI: 3.1, 33.8%; p = 0.02). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 194 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are primarily evaluated through MRI, PET and CSF methods in order to diagnose and monitor disease. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 389 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Niemann-Pick disease type C and Alzheimer's disease are distinct neurodegenerative disorders that share the presence of neurofibrillary tangle pathology. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The p-tau217/Aβ42 ratio was the most reliable plasma biomarker, closely tracking tau PET. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 76 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study validated PrecivityAD2, a mass-spectrometry blood test made by C2N Diagnostics that combines two markers (%p-tau217 and the amyloid-beta 42/40 ratio) into a single 'Amyloid Probability Score 2.' 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 583 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Serum NfL concentration is increased in FAD prior to symptom onset and correlates with measures of disease stage and severity. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 48 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma NfL is superior to plasma t-tau for the diagnosis and prediction of clinical progression of FTLD-S and AD-S. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that plasma NfL has superior diagnostic and prognostic performance vs plasma t-tau in FTLD and AD. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 265 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The use of an amyloid clock enabled visualization and analysis of biomarker changes as a function of estimated years from symptom onset in sporadic AD. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 118 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 52 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 had high accuracy to detect AD, with comparable performance across race. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,135 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
While APOEε4 is associated with increased amyloid-β burden, its association with cerebral tau pathology has been controversial. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 124 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The diagnostic performance of plasma biomarkers was poor (area under the curve [AUC] between 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·62] and 0·74 [0·66-0·82]) except for plasma NfL concentrations, which had an AUC of 0·88 (0·82-0·93) for the differentiation of the asymptomatic group versus the prodromal Alzheimer's disease group and 0·95 (0·92-0·98) for the asymptomatic group versus the Alzheimer's disease dementia group. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 282 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Among 300 participants with DS and a control group of 37 non-DS siblings, mean (SD) age was 45.0 (10.1) years, and 167 (49.6%) were men. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 300 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep duration is linked to amyloid-β clearance while physical activity is associated with brain volume maintenance. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,322 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
PF and BF were significantly associated with increased likelihoods of dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and MCI. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 5,149 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Of 349 participants with available plasma data, 234 met inclusion criteria (31 controls, 141 in the training sample, and 62 in the validation sample). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 46 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma GFAP discriminated AD dementia from normal cognition (adjusted mean difference = 0.90 standard deviation [SD]) and mild cognitive impairment (adjusted mean difference = 0.72 SD), and demonstrated superior discrimination compared to alternative plasma biomarkers. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 567 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Over 20% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) worldwide are Chinese, although the efficacy of existing blood-based measures of AD biomarkers is largely unknown in Asian cohorts. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 425 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results support the link between OCR and CR. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,369 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, memory worsened from age 30 years through the 90s. The HVa worsened gradually from age 30 years to the mid-60s and more steeply beyond that age. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,246 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 32,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 32,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (66.5% of the library) and OpenAlex (15.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,045 records (3.2% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 966 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events
Last updated