Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers

We analysed 461 participants from the DABNI and SPIN cohorts. Both CSF and plasma tau biomarkers increased during the asymptomatic stages of DS and in euploid controls, coinciding with Aβ positivity; across the DS clinical spectrum the largest increases were observed for CSF NTA-tau (fold-change [fc] = 6.46-6.94), CSF p-tau217 (fc = 6.43-6.74) and plasma p-tau217 (fc = 4.63-6.54) (linear regression adjusted for age, sex and APOE-ε4 with Tukey post-hoc tests; all p < 0.001). During the dementia stages, CSF tau biomarkers showed only modest further increases (no CSF biomarker differed between pDS and dDS; all p ≥ 0.268), whereas plasma tau biomarkers retained a broader dynamic range across symptomatic phases (pDS vs dDS: plasma p-tau217 p = 0.001, p-tau181 p = 0.002, p-tau231 p = 0.004). Plasma p-tau217 showed the highest diagnostic accuracy, with areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.91-0.97 for biological categorisations and numerically higher values than CSF in symptomatic stages (pDS vs dDS: plasma p-tau217 AUC = 0.69 [95% CI 0.58-0.80] vs CSF p-tau217 AUC = 0.53 [95% CI 0.41-0.65]; DeLong test p = 0.019). In LOESS analyses, tau biomarkers diverged from age-matched controls in the late 30s to early 40s (e.g., plasma p-tau217 ≈ 37.3 years, CSF p-tau181 ≈ 38.1 years) and reached abnormality (+2 SD) over an approximately 20-year span between the fourth and sixth decades, outlining differential but temporally compressed increases. Finally, during symptomatic stages, tau biomarker levels remained stable in DS-AD, in contrast to sporadic AD, where levels declined with advancing age. These findings highlight the complementary roles of CSF and plasma tau biomarkers in tracking disease progression: CSF biomarkers capture early pathological changes, whereas plasma biomarkers more effectively reflect disease progression within symptomatic stages. Furthermore, tau biomarkers might support disease staging and monitor clinical progression in DS-AD, but with the need to adapt biomarker frameworks to this specific population. FUNDING: La Caixa Foundation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Generalitat de Catalunya, National Institute on Ageing, Wellcome Trust, Jérôme Lejeune Foundation, Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Association, National Institute for Health Research, EU Joint Programme-Neurodegenerative Disease Research, Alzheimer's Society.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 37 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.37 of the 56 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (EBioMedicine)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 461 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42435584)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 37 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Arranz, J., Lantero-Rodríguez, J., Braun-Wohlfahrt, L. S., Vaqué-Alcázar, L., Rodríguez-Baz, Í., Kac, P. R., et al. (2026). CSF and plasma tau biomarkers in the Down syndrome-Alzheimer's disease continuum. EBioMedicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106370

Vancouver

Arranz J, Lantero-Rodríguez J, Braun-Wohlfahrt LS, Vaqué-Alcázar L, Rodríguez-Baz Í, Kac PR, et al. CSF and plasma tau biomarkers in the Down syndrome-Alzheimer's disease continuum. EBioMedicine. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106370. PMID: 42435584.

BibTeX

@article{arranz2026-42435584,
  author  = {Arranz, Javier and Lantero-Rodríguez, Juan and Braun-Wohlfahrt, Luisa Sophie and Vaqué-Alcázar, Lídia and Rodríguez-Baz, Íñigo and Kac, Przemysław R and Arslan, Burak and Maure-Blesa, Lucía and others},
  title   = {{CSF and plasma tau biomarkers in the Down syndrome-Alzheimer's disease continuum}},
  journal = {EBioMedicine},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106370},
  pmid    = {42435584},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2026.106370}
}

Related studies in Biomarkers

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →