27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Circulating metabolites were consistently associated with cognition, dementia, and lifestyle factors, opening new avenues for prevention of cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 25,872 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CIND is very frequent in older people. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,425 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Incidence of dementia in Italy paralleled that in most industrialized countries. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 3,208 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Different biomarkers for Alzheimer disease provide different information from one another that is likely to be complementary. 1 key finding →
Participants: 34 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Long-term use of sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, or insulin was not associated with an altered risk of developing AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Loneliness is a perceived state of social and emotional isolation that has been associated with cognitive and functional decline and an increased risk of incident AD dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 25 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is frequent after ischemic stroke, occurring in one-fourth of the elderly patients in the authors' cohort. 3 key findings →
Participants: 453 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Poorer OI in older adults without dementia was associated with increased risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,428 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In this large cohort of older adults, long-term PM2.5 exposure was associated with increased dementia incidence. 3 key findings →
Participants: 541 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Women who underwent either unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy before the onset of menopause had an increased risk of cognitive impairment or dementia compared to referent women (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46; 95% CI 1.13 to 1.90; adjusted for education, type of interview, and history of depression). 2 key findings →
Participants: 813 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Contrary to previous reports, head trauma was not a risk factor for AD, and smoking did not protect against AD. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Selective survival of men with a healthier cardiovascular risk profile and hence lower propensity to dementia might partly explain the higher LTR of dementia/AD in women. 1 key finding →
Participants: 7,901 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia and subtypes Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia may be related to atrial fibrillation even if no clinical stokes have occurred. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,584 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Risk factors for progression from MCI to probable AD differed in men and women. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 294 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Chronic obesity is associated with several complications, including cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It has been suggested that the risk might be particularly increased for carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,645 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Individual cardiometabolic disorders and genetic factors are associated with an increased dementia risk; however, the relationship between dementia and cardiometabolic multimorbidity is unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 236 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although sleep, physical activity and sedentary behavior have been found to be associated with dementia risk, findings are inconsistent and their joint relationship remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 431,924 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Analyses were performed within the Rotterdam Study (baseline 1997), a prospective, population-based cohort. 4 key findings →
Participants: 9,446 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), a measure of average blood glucose level, is associated with the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Participants: 13,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to evaluate the link between severe hypoglycaemia and domain-specific cognitive decline, smaller brain volumes and dementia in adults with type 2 diabetes, which so far has been relatively poorly characterised. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 580 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Setting and participants A total of 316,669 participants [mean (SD) age, 56.3 (8.1) years] without prior cardiovascular disease or dementia from the UK Biobank study at baseline survey (2006-2010) were enrolled. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 316,669 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Poor social health is likely associated with cognitive decline and risk of dementia; however, studies show inconsistent results. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,514 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to investigate whether the increased risk of dementia among individuals with diabetes can be offset by a broad combination of healthy lifestyle factors. 4 key findings →
Participants: 167,946 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
From 2000 to 2002, we assessed parental history of dementia in participants without dementia of the Rotterdam Study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,087 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 1,130 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →