27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
There is sufficient evidence to take seriously the possibility that depression is a risk factor for dementia and cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Affective disorders appear to be associated with an increased risk of developing dementia, and one that is dependent on clinical and demographic variables. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Social determinants of health (SDHs) are the primary drivers of preventable health inequities, and the associations between SDHs and health outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 17 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Identifying independent and interactive associations of a wide range of diseases and multimorbidity and apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) with dementia may help promote cognitive health. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 471,485 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The association between vascular risk factors and dementia varies with age, making generalizability of dementia risk prediction rules to individuals of different ages challenging. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,899 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
However, not all plant-based foods are necessarily beneficial for dementia or depression. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 180,532 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We have undertaken a large unselected, community-based neuropathology study in an elderly (70-103 years) UK population in relation to prospectively evaluated dementia status. 4 key findings →
Participants: 209 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Patients with AD and individuals at risk for AD show reduced glucose metabolism, as indexed by fludeoxyglucose F 18-labeled positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 150 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The sample included 3 329 977 beneficiaries (2 126 290 [63.9%] female, 33 887 [1.0%] Asian, 354 771 [10.7%] Black, 61 515 [1.8%] Hispanic, 2 831 391 [85.0%] White, and 891 815 [26.8%] dual eligible for Medicaid). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a neurotropic virus that establishes lifelong latency in humans. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study sample included 1,375 participants free of dementia and stroke at baseline (mean age 68 ± 6y, 54 % females). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,375 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Distinct associations between different traffic noise exposures and incident dementia subtypes were found in this large UK prospective cohort study. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 502,416 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 2,323 MEMENTO participants, 2,136 (92%) were included in this study. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 307 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Obesity and Area Deprivation Index, a measure of socioeconomic status, were significantly associated with elevated AD risk within the hypertensive cohort. 4 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 1,862 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
People with raised systolic blood pressure (≥160 mm Hg) or high serum cholesterol concentration (≥6.5 mmol/l) in midlife had a significantly higher risk of Alzheimer's disease in later life, even after adjustment for age, body mass index, education, vascular events, smoking status, and alcohol consumption, than those with normal systolic blood pressure (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 5.5) or serum cholesterol (odds ratio 2.1, 1.0 to 4.4). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,449 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's Disease (AD) represents the most common type of dementia and is becoming a steadily increasing challenge for health systems globally. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This meta-analysis highlights sleep management as a pivotal modifiable factor in reducing the risk of all-cause cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During the 17-year follow-up period, 164 participants developed dementia; 136 of these cases were AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 164 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Occurrence of dementia during the 20 years of follow-up was 4%. 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,409 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
It is unclear whether persons with diabetes are at increased risk for dementia, including Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The findings support the cross-cultural use of a relatively inexpensive odor identification test as an early biomarker of cognitive decline and AD dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,037 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Level of evidence Level V, systematic review. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Potentially modifiable risk factors from early and midlife, with a cumulative detrimental effect on the brain, contribute to risk of dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 310 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
There are cross-sectional evidences of an association between sleep disorders and cognitive impairment on older adults. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This search located 10,338 individual references, of which 164 are included in this review. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
8 of the 1,130 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 8. The same 8 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →