28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
From a clinical perspective, these data further support the rationale for physicians to provide effective management of CVD risk factors and for patients to be compliant with such recommendations to possibly prevent cognitive decline/dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
High-fat diet had a wider array of metabolic, cognitive, and neuropathological consequences in AD and MxD females compared to males. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Light-to-moderate alcohol intake is associated with a lower prevalence of vascular brain findings and, in APOE epsilon4 carriers, hippocampal and amygdalar atrophy on MRI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 509 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Heart disease is the major leading cause of death and disability in the world. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Frailty is commonly considered as a syndrome with several symptoms, including weight loss, exhaustion, weakness, slow walking speed and physical inactivity. 4 key findings →
Participants: 654 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has a well-documented prognostic value for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and higher levels are associated with cognitive-dysfunction in patients with CVD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 6,040 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Growing evidence has suggested an association between sleep duration and Alzheimer's disease (AD), but it is unclear if sleep duration is a manifestation of the AD disease process. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 5353 MA beneficiary observations (1239 [23.1%] aged 65-74 years; 3127 [58.4%] aged ≥75 years; 1785 male [33.3%]), 1629 (30.4%) reported a diagnosis of ADRD, and 3724 (69.6%) did not report an ADRD diagnosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Key Points Regardless of race and ethnicity, older adults with kidney failure residing in or receiving care at dialysis facilities located in high-segregation neighborhoods were at a 1.63-fold and 1.53-fold higher risk of dementia diagnosis, respectively. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The rate of hospital admissions are variable between GP practices, with deprivation and being admitted from home as risk factors for admission for ACSC and non-ACSC admissions. 5 key findings →
Participants: 7,076 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
105 participants (47 Latino, 55 Black), 64.7 (±8.8) years-old, female 66 (63%), with 16 (±2.3) years of education were assessed. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 105 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Lifestyle factors and ambient air pollution are linked to dementia and CMDs, yet few studies have investigated their impact on dementia risk in CMDs patients at the same time. 1 key finding →
Participants: 438,681 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We used cross-sectional data from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) from 1999 to 2018 linked to National Death Index records. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Diabetes is a global health concern associated with complications such as cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the fully adjusted model, the odds ratio (OR) for persistent loneliness was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10, 1.95). 5 key findings →
Participants: 9,389 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Half of the participants were over 70, with no formal education. 5 key findings →
Participants: 567 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Four clusters were identified: least disadvantaged (Class 1: 31.5% men; 30.6% women), most disadvantaged (Class 2: 20.2% men; 19.4% women), high social support with Class 1 features (Class 3: 22.2% men; 24.1% women), and high social support with Class 2 features (Class 4: 26.1% men; 25.7% women). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
T2DM is one of the strong risk factors of ADRD but genetic T2DM effect does not contribute to ADRD risk. 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
From 356 participants, 104 were MCI-C, whereas 252 were MCI-NC. 5 key findings →
Participants: 356 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Over a median follow-up period of 10.44 years, 725 participants developed incident dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 104,572 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 289,649 included participants, 137,480 (47.5 %) were male, and the mean age was 56.6 ± 8.1 years. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The findings of this study suggest that predictive modeling could inform patients and clinicians about ASCVD at risk for dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 29,561 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Predictive performance was comparable across algorithms, with R² ranging from 0.201 to 0.361, highest in the MCI_All dataset. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 4,958 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia affects approximately 55 million people globally, with modifiable risk factors contributing significantly to its prevalence. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
During a 7-year median follow-up, type 2 diabetes was associated with the highest risk of all-cause dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06 to 1.31), followed by hypertension and hyperlipidemia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
9 of the 1,131 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 9. The same 9 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →