Higher baseline WMH volume and higher GFAP were associated with a greater likelihood of diagnostic progression. 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Higher baseline WMH volume and higher GFAP were associated with a greater likelihood of diagnostic progression. 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Lower CSF Amyloid beta 1-42 concentrations (p = 0.048), lower Amyloid beta 42/40 ratio (p = 0.038), and higher Tau/Amyloid-beta 1-42 ratio, as well as pTau/Amyloid-beta 1-42 ratio (each p = 0.004) were associated with rpAD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 228 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The score reflecting the severity of Aβ pathology showed a better correlation with ln(Aβ42/Aβ40) (R 2 = 0.506, β = -0.713, P < 0.001) than with ln(Aβ42) (R 2 = 0.206, β = -0.458, P < 0.001), which was confirmed after adjusting for covariates. 4 key findings →
Participants: 159 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
SerpinA1 (α1-antitrypsin) is a soluble glycoprotein, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) isoforms of which showed disease-specific changes in neurodegenerative disorders that are still unexplored in Alz-heimer’s disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Participants: 29 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We aimed to assess the utility of AT(N) classification in clinical practice. 2 key findings →
Participants: 230 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
AD-MCI and AD-DEM patients showed increased p-tau217 and spectral slowing (higher theta, lower alpha). 4 key findings →
Participants: 128 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL) are putative non-amyloid biomarkers indicative of ongoing inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease processes. 2 key findings →
Participants: 20 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
CSF irisin correlated positively with BDNF, Aβ42, and MMSE scores, but not with CSF total tau. 2 key findings →
Participants: 14 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Recently, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) YKL-40 levels were reported to be a promising candidate biomarker of glial inflammation in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 63 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We aimed to evaluate the specificity of neurogranin (Ng) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a dementia cohort. 2 key findings →
Participants: 116 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ)42/phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 showed excellent performance in differentiating autopsy-confirmed AD and predicting the risk of neuropathological changes in early and late clinical stages. 5 key findings →
Participants: 100 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We found statistically significant batch differences for all biomarkers and ratios, except that neurofilament light was comparable between batches 1 and 2. 4 key findings →
Participants: 528 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood-based biomarkers offer strong potential to revolutionize diagnosis, trial enrolment and treatment monitoring in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Participants: 962 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
GMM-based cutoffs classified less subjects as T+, mainly in the A- CN (<3.4% vs >28.5%) and A+ CN (<14.5% vs >42.9%) groups and showed higher agreement with visual rating (ICC=0.91 vs ICC<0.62) than published cutoffs. 3 key findings →
Participants: 269 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Elevated CSF p-tau181 and cortical 18F-PI-2620 binding was characteristic for AD while normal CSF p-tau181 with elevated subcortical 18F-PI-2620 binding was characteristic for 4RTs. 18F-PI-2620-assessed posterior cortical hypoperfusion could be used as an additional neuronal injury biomarker in AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 64 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In total, 740 proteins were identified of which, 25 differentially-expressed proteins in AD came from comparisons within a single racial and ethnic background group. 5 key findings →
Participants: 113 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
After adjustment, only plasma p‐tau181 and NfL were significantly elevated in Aβ+ Obj‐SCD participants compared to Aβ− NC group. 5 key findings →
Participants: 234 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Aβ misfolding and GFAP showed a strong ability to predict clinical AD risk and may be important early AD risk markers. 1 key finding →
Participants: 68 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These in vivo data support the role of Aβ pathology in the etiology and highlight the potential utility of CSF Aβ42 as an early prognostic biomarker of dementia associated with PD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 20 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Nine hundred and four participants (342 AD and 562 NAD) were studied; 400 in Mtp-1 and 504 in Mtp-2. 5 key findings →
Participants: 904 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The present study creates the first-ever multiethnic referent sample that spans community-based and clinic-based populations for implementation of an AD blood screen. 1 key finding →
Participants: 1,329 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A panel of structure- and concentration-based plasma amyloid biomarkers may predict conversion to clinical MCI and dementia due to AD in cognitively unimpaired subjects. 3 key findings →
Participants: 203 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
GFAP, NfL and pTau 181 levels in plasma were lower in SCD and MCI than in AD patients. 4 key findings →
Participants: 152 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Two components were identified. Proinflammatory Component 2 was elevated in AD/MCI and in Black/African American participants, and strongly associated with poorer cognition (independently of neurofilament light [NfL], phosphorylated tau 217 [p-tau217], and glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP]). 3 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is one of the key tools for the state-of-the-art differential diagnosis of dementias. 3 key findings →
Participants: 100 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 707 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →