Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 476–498 of 498 studies · free to read (page 20 of 20) · 30,580 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of these 498 studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Showing 498 studies tagged phosphorylated — clear

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

It has been increasingly recognized that the pathological progress of Alzheimer´s disease (AD) is connected to metabolic function and inflammation. 4 key findings →

Participants: 18 Evidence: low

In the study scenario, adding plasma p -tau217 testing to SCE reduced diagnostic costs by $342/patient, through more efficient use of amyloid PET and CSF testing. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

We found that induction of adult human brain-like 4R Tau isoform expression enables endogenous formation of late-stage Tauopathy hallmarks in iPSC-derived neurons engineered to contain synergistic Tau mutations. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

To the Editor: We have recently highlighted the potential pitfalls of amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET, suggesting that both Aβ and tau assessments are necessary to relate clinical symptoms to Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology.1 Herein, we would like to present 3 additional cases related to the clinical practice of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for AD. 4 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

Development of small molecules promoting tau degradation in Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 32 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-12-01

Within around 700 new designed PROTACs, we found by computational modelling more than 25 PROTACs that were predicted to have a better ability to form ternary complexes than the previously reported PROTACs. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

We recently confirmed and extended these findings using recombinant TauOs generated from full-length human tau in the presence of arachidonic acid (Balducci et al., 2025; Figure 1). 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Semantic dementia (SD) is a type of dementia characterized by a loss of semantic memory, typically presenting with left-predominant temporal lobe atrophy and a frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TDP-43 (FTLD-TDP) type C pathology. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Beyond their role in energy production, mitochondria also interact with other organelles through forming membrane contacts that serve as central hubs of cellular metabolism and signaling. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

This method differentiated eight tauopathies, including Alzheimer's disease, Pick disease, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), corticobasal degeneration (CBD), argyrophilic grain disease (AGD), frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism associated with chromosome 17 with N279K mutation (FTDP-17 N279K), and globular glial tauopathies types II and III. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Defective mitochondrial quality control is increasingly implicated in tau-mediated neurodegeneration, but how distinct tau lesions in different cell types interact with PINK1-PRKN-mediated mitophagy remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

For all 3 analytes, less than 10% difference was observed between the concentrations measured on day 0 and after 14 days of transportation and refrigeration. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Implications of virus-induced stress granules in tauopathies

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Translational Neurodegeneration 2026-02-12

Tauopathies are characterized by aberrant tau structure and function, which is associated with neurodegenerative dementias, such as Alzheimer's disease, Pick's disease, and frontotemporal dementia, as well as the motor neuron disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Tauopathies are a group of neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and progressive supranuclear palsy, characterized by the pathological accumulation of tau protein. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

hONE-NPCs expressed proteins such as Ki67, Nestin, GFAP, and b-III Tubulin, which are associated with cellular proliferation and the neuronal progenitor lineage. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

A doença de Alzheimer (DA) configura-se como a principal causa de demência em idosos, se tornando um dos maiores desafios da medicina moderna devido à sua alta prevalência e o impacto social associado. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

BackgroundTuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in TSC1 or TSC2, resulting in chronic hyperactivation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. 5 key findings →

Evidence: moderate

Development and External Validation of a Plasma p-tau217-Based Model for MCI-to-Dementia Progression

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-16

--Clinical trajectories after a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) vary widely, so prognostic models must account for both the timing of subsequent diagnoses and unequal follow-up. 2 key findings →

Participants: 401 Evidence: moderate

Elevation in Plasma p-tau217 Concentrations Among Blood Donors: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv (preprint) 2026-09-24

Plasma p-tau217 concentrations were positively associated with plasma TNF- (Kendalls {tau} = 0.339; P < .001) and IL-6 (Kendalls {tau} = 0.310; P < .001) concentrations. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed    Where this research is being discussed: events