Høilund-Carlsen and colleagues raise concern regarding the reliability of amyloid PET to exclude Alzheimer disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
28,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Høilund-Carlsen and colleagues raise concern regarding the reliability of amyloid PET to exclude Alzheimer disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
To determine the relationship between regional brain edema caused by anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy (ARIA-E) and the degree of regional β-amyloid (Aβ) positron emission tomography (PET) signal reduction. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and one of the leading causes of death in adults age 65 y or older in the United States. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To the Editor: We have recently highlighted the potential pitfalls of amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET, suggesting that both Aβ and tau assessments are necessary to relate clinical symptoms to Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology.1 Herein, we would like to present 3 additional cases related to the clinical practice of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for AD. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Donanemab increased total healthcare costs ($300,689 vs. $178,121) and societal costs ($389,113 vs. $283,618) compared with standard care per capita, while improving health outcomes (4.38 vs. 4.01 QALYs) per capita. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The introduction of the first anti-amyloid mAb represents a paradigm shift in the management of AD, but is not free of challenges. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Orally dosed D-AIP possessed favourable biostability, pharmacokinetics, and brain region distribution. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Like CP2, C458 and C273 weakly inhibit mtCI, leading to AMPK activation, which triggers a neuroprotective stress response. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the in-between stage between healthy cognitive aging and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Letter in response to the article by Wang et al. recently published in Alzheimer's & Dementia (Wang W, Wang Q, Qi X, Gurney M, Perry G, Volkow ND, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Compared with conventional activities, GDRT resulted in significantly greater reductions in overall BPSD (r = 0.56, p = .001) and caregiver burden (r = 0.44, p = .011). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
According to the latest report in 2024 by the World Health Organization, based on global data from 2021, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other forms of dementia rank seventh among the leading causes of death worldwide, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These dysregulations are associated with malfunctions in multiple signaling pathways or disrupted mechanical cellular responses. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The recent approval of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) marks a major shift in clinical practice. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The 2022 revision of Japanese healthcare reimbursement removed pharmacists from the mandatory dysphagia team, despite emerging evidence of medication-related swallowing complications. 3 key findings →
Participants: 59 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We sought to identify patterns in occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) home health care visits among people living with dementia (PLWD) by (1) level of function care partner report compared with administrative data, (2) race and ethnicity, and (3) level of socioeconomic resources. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We have evaluated serum alpha 1-antichymotrypsin content in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). 3 key findings →
Participants: 26 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The number of dementia cases continues to increase with Alzheimer's disease as the leading cause. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The role of primary health care has been studied in several sites and the results are promising, with an emphasis on the usefulness of community support and non-pharmacological interventions 10, 11. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Theranostics—the use of diagnostic and therapeutic drugs that target the same molecular marker of disease—extends beyond the paradigm of radiopharmaceutical drug pairs used in oncologic settings (e.g., somatostatin receptor subtype 2 and prostate-specific membrane antigen theranostics) to other 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Monoclonal antibodies such as lecanemab and donanemab show reduction in amyloid plaque and slowing of cognitive and functional decline (modest) in early AD (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia). 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Monoclonal antibodies such as lecanemab and donanemab show reduction in amyloid plaque and slowing of cognitive and functional decline (modest) in early AD (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia). 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by progressive accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides, initiating a pathological cascade from soluble monomers to toxic oligomers, protofibrils, fibrils, and ultimately extracellular amyloid plaques that contribute to synaptic dysfunction and neuronal degeneration. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and the sixth leading cause of death among adults ≥65 years in the United States (1). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 3,475 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.8% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,038 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 966 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →