Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia and the sixth leading cause of death among adults ≥65 years in the United States (1). By 2060, approximately 14 million Americans are projected to have AD, and twice as many may have mild cognitive impairment (1). In 2025, the total cost of caring for patients with dementia is estimated at $384 billion. This is predicted to rise toward about $1 trillion over the next three decades (1). The pathophysiology of AD remains poorly understood, with multifactorial etiology (age, genetics, environmental, and lifestyle factors). AD is histologically characterized by β-amyloid deposition and pathologic tau protein in the brain. It is currently diagnosed by cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers (total tau, phosphorylated tau, and amyloid-β42); positron emission tomography (amyloid or tau); or the newly FDA-approved blood tests (Lumipulse G pTau217/β-amyloid 1–42 plasma ratio and Elecsys pTau181). Current AD therapies are limited. Cholinesterase inhibitors offer modest cognitive benefit, and newly approved anti-amyloid antibody infusions slow mild-stage progression by approximately 30% but carry the risk of serious adverse effects (1). With most AD drugs trials failing, a substantial unmet therapeutic need remains.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Suhandynata, R. T., Bevins, E. A., & Metushi, I. G. (2025). Endogenous Lithium Levels and Alzheimer Disease. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf174

Vancouver

Suhandynata RT, Bevins EA, Metushi IG. Endogenous Lithium Levels and Alzheimer Disease. Clinical Chemistry. 2025. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvaf174. PMID: 41784383.

BibTeX

@article{suhandynata2025-41784383,
  author  = {Suhandynata, Raymond T. and Bevins, Elizabeth A. and Metushi, Imir G.},
  title   = {{Endogenous Lithium Levels and Alzheimer Disease}},
  journal = {Clinical Chemistry},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1093/clinchem/hvaf174},
  pmid    = {41784383},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf174}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This text notes that current Alzheimer's therapies are limited, with cholinesterase inhibitors offering modest cognitive benefit and newly approved anti-amyloid antibody infusions slowing mild-stage progression by about 30% while carrying risk of serious adverse effects. It states that most Alzheimer's drug trials have failed and a substantial unmet therapeutic need remains.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 31 of 100.31 of 100 points earned69 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Clinical Chemistry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Clinical Chemistry: journal h-index 323 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Imir G. Metushi: h-index 17 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, Los Angeles: institution h-index 1,923 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41784383)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

166 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →