Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Monoclonal antibodies such as lecanemab and donanemab show reduction in amyloid plaque and slowing of cognitive and functional decline (modest) in early AD (mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia). In contrast, Aducanumab while initially promising ended up showing mixed results and due to inconsistent clinical outcomes, it is not approved by Health Canada at present. Tau‑targeting and anti‑inflammatory agents are under investigation but have not yet demonstrated definitive benefit. Key risks include amyloid‑related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), infusion reactions, cost, and lack of data for long term safety. Canadian health system challenges include lack of access to biomarker testing and imaging, Lack of healthcare specialists, and reimbursement frameworks. Using DMTs in the early phases of AD offers significant promise in altering disease progression. However, Family Physicians needs to thoroughly evaluate the risk to benefit ratio, ensure careful patient selection, and work in close collaboration with specialists. Furthermore, ensuring the healthcare system is ready— with access to proper testing facilities, coverage models, and support systems—is essential for the safe and equitable implementation of these therapies.

Key findings

Why it matters

Lecanemab and donanemab modestly slow cognitive and functional decline in early Alzheimer disease, while aducanumab showed mixed results and is not approved by Health Canada. Tau-targeting and anti-inflammatory agents are still under investigation and have not yet shown definitive benefit.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 29 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.29 of the 93 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 29 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Science and Research Archive)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 International Journal of Science and Research Archive: journal h-index 43 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “narrative review”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 29 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 29 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Sharma, G. (2025). Lecanemab, Donanemab, and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer Disease: Clinical Evidence and Primary Care Implications in Canada. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.1.2929

Vancouver

Sharma G. Lecanemab, Donanemab, and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer Disease: Clinical Evidence and Primary Care Implications in Canada. International Journal of Science and Research Archive. 2025. doi:10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.1.2929.

BibTeX

@article{sharma2025-1b2f6657,
  author  = {Sharma, Geetika},
  title   = {{Lecanemab, Donanemab, and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer Disease: Clinical Evidence and Primary Care Implications in Canada}},
  journal = {International Journal of Science and Research Archive},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.1.2929},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2025.17.1.2929}
}

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →