The prevalence of MetS was low in adults with DS. 5 key findings →
Participants: 389 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The prevalence of MetS was low in adults with DS. 5 key findings →
Participants: 389 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
High serum/plasma cholesterol levels have been suggested as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Whether depression is a long-term risk factor for dementia or represents a dementia prodrome is unclear. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We studied whether anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders are associated with the risk of dementia and cognition. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,708 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents a major cause of death and disability in developed countries. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Area deprivation index (ADI), a tool used to capture the multidimensional neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage across populations, is highly relevant to the field of aging and Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting for multi-morbidity and relocation-related selection bias, we saw that people living in regions with the highest tertile of income (HR = 0.87, p < 0.001), and who had the highest tertile of remaining life expectancy at age 60 (HR = 0.93, p = 0.012) had lower dementia risks. 5 key findings →
Participants: 250,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study investigates the role of individual and area-level social health factors in shaping geographic variation in dementia incidence among older adults in Finland. 1 key finding →
Participants: 185,712 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Even after accounting for established individual‐level demographic, socioeconomic, health, and genetic risk factors for cognitive decline, greater neighborhood disadvantage is associated with an accelerated rate of annualized decline in delayed recall performance across mid to late life in a community sample. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,554 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
ε4, socioeconomic status, physical activity, smoking, subjective cognitive decline, and various cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global prevalence of dementia is increasing. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 9,656 (13.5%) participants had at least 1 CMD at baseline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 71,648 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among a cohort comprising 109,778 individuals, the use of GLP-1RA demonstrated a reduced risk of dementia compared with its non-use (aHR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97). 4 key findings →
Participants: 109,778 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global age-standardized prevalence of AD and other dementias increased from 672 (95% uncertainty interval: 589 to 764) per 100,000 population in 1990 to 694 (603 to 794) per 100,000 population in 2021, with AAPCs of 0.09% (95% confidence interval: 0.06% to 0.11%). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At baseline, participants were aged 70-95 years (mean: 75.2 ± 4.3), with 54% being women. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During wakefulness, neuromodulators operate largely independently to support behavior and cognition. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Plasma from individuals with a higher WMH burden was associated with increased BBB disruption in hBMEC. 5 key findings →
Participants: 155 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In mid-life, the sample sizes ranged from 4100 in 2022 to 5589 in 2017-18 and in late-life from 2799 in 2011-12 to 3762 in 2017-18. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher GCA was associated with lower dementia risk (hazard ratio = 0.865, 95% confidence interval = 0.756 to 0.990). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of dementia (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91) and Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98) compared to DPP4is. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 12,351 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Epidemiological studies consistently indicate a two- to threefold increased risk of dementia among individuals with schizophrenia, although estimates vary due to diagnostic and ascertainment biases. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study suggested that the long‐term exposure to air pollution was associated an increased risk of the transitions from health to incident cataract, dementia or the progression of both conditions. 2 key findings →
Participants: 409,608 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Emerging research found air pollution may be associated with incident Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other dementias. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
After adjusting for various factors, the incidence of Alzheimer dementia was significantly higher in the anosmia group compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.04-1.28). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 8,023 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 90 participants included in the analyses, 34 had moderate to severe WMH. 5 key findings →
Participants: 154 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 3,281 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →