Twenty-five out of 44 completed the trial. 5 key findings →
Participants: 25 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This review aimed to evaluate the effects of multi-domain interventions on cognition among individuals without dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 10,056 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This Finnish randomized controlled trial was the first large study to show that a two-year program combining diet counseling, exercise, cognitive training, and monitoring of heart-health risk factors could help maintain or improve thinking skills in older adults at elevated dementia risk, compared with a control group who received only general health advice. 3 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 1,260 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Previous data have linked omega-3 fatty acids with risk of dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 103,651 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
74/100
Also, we performed analyses including only trials in which an increase in the cardiovascular fitness of participants had been demonstrated. 5 key findings →
Participants: 754 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
74/100
A long-term intervention with an EVOO-rich MedDiet resulted in a better cognitive function in comparison with a control diet. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 285 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Supported by very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence, physical activity/exercise has a positive effect on several cognitive and noncognitive outcomes in people with MCI and dementia, but RCTs, with low risk of bias/confounding, are still needed to confirm these relationships. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 28,205 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Relative to a control condition, we found moderate-quality evidence showing a small to moderate effect of CT on our first primary outcome, composite measure of global cognition at end of treatment (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23 to 0.62), and high-quality evidence showing a moderate effect on the secondary outcome of verbal semantic fluency (SMD 0.52, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.81) at end of treatment, with these gains retained in the medium term (3 to 12 months post treatment). 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 653 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In both phases, men were encouraged to visit their physician if the screen results indicated possible cognitive impairment. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 7,540 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Furthermore, hippocampal subfields susceptible to atrophy in AD were protected by PRT revealing an elimination of long-term atrophy in the left subiculum, and attenuation of atrophy in left CA1 and dentate gyrus when compared to SHAM+SHAM (p = 0.023, p = 0.020 and p = 0.027). 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Hippocampal volume is a marker of brain health and is reduced with aging and neurological disease. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 23 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Given projected increases in dementia prevalence, emphasising earlier stages of cognitive impairment in older adults enables targeted early intervention strategies. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 4,120 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
CCT is efficacious for overall and key cognitive domains in adults with MS, but efficacy on other outcomes and in progressive subtypes remains unclear. 2 key findings →
Participants: 982 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study found that CT+Active tDCS did not produce greater memory improvement compared to CT+Sham tDCS. 5 key findings →
Participants: 68 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
SMART will provide a novel evaluation of the immediate and long term benefits of CT, PRT, and combined CT and PRT on global cognitive function and brain morphology, as well as potential underlying mechanisms of adaptation in older adults at risk of further cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Advancing age increases the risk for diseases and health concerns like cognitive decline, constituting a major public health challenge. 1 key finding →
Participants: 631 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
If results from this study show benefits for cognition at trial completion, CCT programs, alone or in combination with walking, might be a strategy to promote healthy cognitive aging in older adults. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings indicate that a 4-week simultaneous memory training and aerobic exercise program is sufficient to improve memory, attention, and reasoning abilities in older adults. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive training was effective in enhancing the overall cognitive functioning of less educated older adults with subjective memory complaints. 2 key findings →
Participants: 111 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Since our cognitive training showed beneficial effects, it could be a promising method to prevent POCD. 1 key finding →
Participants: 37 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In this pilot study, RFM and the multi-domain approach CPR were feasible and had preliminary beneficial effects in older adults with MCI in primary care setting in Hong Kong. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The heterogeneous and multi-factorial nature of dementia requires the consideration of all health aspects when predicting the risk of its development and planning strategies for its prevention. 2 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
74/100
Hippocampal volume increase in response to aerobic exercise has been consistently observed in animal models. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 737 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Bilingualism has been linked to improved executive function and delayed onset of dementia, but it is unknown whether similar benefits can be obtained later in life through deliberate intervention. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 76 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Exercise training increases fitness, physical function, cognitive function, and positive behavior in people with dementia and related cognitive impairments. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 2,020 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
From across this tag
10 of the 1,888 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
- MIND Diet and Cognitive Function in Puerto Rican Older Adults
- Home-based multimodal exercise program in older people with Alzheimer disease: Randomized controlled trial protocol
- Sleep Characteristics and Risk of Stroke and Dementia: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study
- Associations between sleep disturbance and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ, and shared proteomic signatures in Alzheimer's disease
- Association of mediterranean diet with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Association Between Dietary Habits in Midlife With Dementia Incidence Over a 20-Year Period
- Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Public Health Strategies
- Amyloid imaging results from the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging
- Exercise programs for people with dementia
- Social isolation, loneliness, genetic risk, and incident dementia in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A population-based cohort study
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →