Home › Research › Prevention trials
The Effects of Multi-Domain Interventions on Cognition: A Systematic Review
Sangwoo Ahn, Jae Woo Chung, Monica K Crane, David R Bassett, Joel G Anderson. Western journal of nursing research, 2021-07-14
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
This review aimed to evaluate the effects of multi-domain interventions on cognition among individuals without dementia. Multi-domain interventions refer to those combining any single preventive measure such as physical activity, cognitive training, and/or nutrition to prevent dementia. Seventeen studies were included (n = 10,056 total participants; mean age = 73 years), eight of which were rated as strong in quality while the other nine showed moderate quality. The standardized mean difference (SMD; d) was used to calculate the effect size for each included study. Multi-domain interventions consisting of physical activity, cognitive training, cardioprotective nutrition, and/or cardiovascular health education exerted beneficial effects on global cognition, episodic memory, and/or executive function with very small to moderate effect sizes (0.16-0.77). Nurses may consider combining these components to potentially stave off dementia. Future research is warranted to identify the optimal multi-domain intervention components that can induce clinically significant beneficial effects on cognition.
Key findings
- Future research is warranted to identify the optimal multi-domain intervention components that can induce clinically significant beneficial effects on cognition.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Participants10,056
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 75/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 42 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 75 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Western journal of nursing research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 12 / 12 | A systematic review of all the studies on the question (from PubMed type “Systematic Review”) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2022 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 4 / 4 | 10,056 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34261376) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 42 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 42 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 75 out of 100. |
| Total | 75 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Ahn, S., Chung, J. W., Crane, M. K., Bassett, D. R., & Anderson, J. G. (2022). The Effects of Multi-Domain Interventions on Cognition: A Systematic Review. Western journal of nursing research. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211032272
Vancouver
Ahn S, Chung JW, Crane MK, Bassett DR, Anderson JG. The Effects of Multi-Domain Interventions on Cognition: A Systematic Review. Western journal of nursing research. 2022. doi:10.1177/01939459211032272. PMID: 34261376.
BibTeX
@article{ahn2022-34261376,
author = {Ahn, Sangwoo and Chung, Jae Woo and Crane, Monica K and Bassett, David R and Anderson, Joel G},
title = {{The Effects of Multi-Domain Interventions on Cognition: A Systematic Review}},
journal = {Western journal of nursing research},
year = {2022},
doi = {10.1177/01939459211032272},
pmid = {34261376},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211032272}
}
Related studies in Prevention trials
Also tagged “exercise-training”
125 studies in the library carry the topic tag “exercise-training”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 125 tagged studies.