27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The aging of the European population will lead to a rapid increase in dementia cases in the coming decades, posing challenges for the organization and provision of end-of-life care. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Measurement using validated tools for resident and family satisfaction and health outcomes showed that culture change interventions or clusters of interventions had few negative impacts, but also seldom resulted in statistically significant improvement. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Comorbidity indices for patients with cognitive impairment increased during the 6-year study period, especially after the index. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,711 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In 2022, the overall prevalence of homebound beneficiaries was 22.0% (8.4% of beneficiaries were homebound, and 13.6% were semihomebound). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We found that a larger share of Hispanic Medicare residents that are admitted to nursing homes have ADRD compared with African American and White beneficiaries. 3 key findings →
Participants: 1,302,099 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
memantine, cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI), antipsychotic use] estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% CIs for resident, facility, and HRR characteristics. 5 key findings →
Participants: 9,735 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Overall, 233,567 long-term home care recipients with known carer status were studied. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A European Task Force has recently developed and published the concept and protocols for the setup of the innovative health offer of Brain Health Services for the secondary prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment (dBHS). dBHS are outpatient health care facilities where adult persons can find an assessment of their risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, have their risk level and contributing factors communicated using appropriate language supported by adequate communication tools, can decide to participate to programs for personalized risk reduction if at higher risk, and benefit from cognitive enhancement interventions. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Thirty-three studies were included. Over half were conducted in Western countries (n =20). 5 key findings →
Participants: 20 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Within 365 days, 5.2% (N = 10709) of individuals had a delirium or dementia-related hospitalization. 5 key findings →
Participants: 207,343 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of 574 older adults, 187 (33%) were admitted. 5 key findings →
Participants: 574 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The study cohort comprised patients with a mean age of 87.2 ± 7.2 years (n = 100), 63% of whom had lived in nursing homes. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 100 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study aimed to examine the associations between nursing home (NH) quality and prevalence of newly admitted NH residents with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), and to assess the extent to which market-level wages for certified nursing assistants (CNAs) and state Medicaid behavioral and mental health add-on policy may influence such associations. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,777 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A self-assessment scale has been developed and found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Implementation was feasible to differing degrees across sites, dependent on context. 3 key findings →
Participants: 19 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results suggest that some aspects of the palliative care provided to elderly patients with end-stage chronic diseases, admitted to acute care hospitals, could be improved. 2 key findings →
Participants: 102 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study suggests that violence is a significant phenomenon and that all health workers, especially nurses, are at risk of suffering aggressive assaults. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Simple MRI biomarkers, in addition to their diagnostic use, have a prognostic value with respect to mortality in a memory clinic population. 2 key findings →
Participants: 220 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A heterogeneous community sample (n=371) of predominantly ethnic minority elderly assessed by standardized research protocol, 231 of whom met criteria for dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). 2 key findings →
Participants: 371 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In individuals without a prior diagnosis of cognitive impairment, the prevalence of dementia was low, but the prevalence of CIND was high. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Ageing societies and a rising prevalence of dementia are associated with increasing demand for care home places. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
On Census Day, 1.4% of the study sample were living in a nursing home, 1.2% in a seniors' residence, 7.1% in a private dwelling with additional family, and 90.3% in a private dwelling. 5 key findings →
Participants: 81,411 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
TBI had the highest percentage (37%) compared to other conditions, which may be attributed to the prevalent challenge of cognitive impairment in TBI in addition to physical disability. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,285 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Receipt of potentially burdensome hospitalizations and treatments; receipt of postdischarge home and facility care. 5 key findings →
Participants: 659 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A comprehensive outcome monitoring system to monitor the quality and safety of care and variation for HCP recipients was developed. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 68 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 976 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →