Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Contrary to the experience at the Crichton Royal, our major difficulty is providing in-patient beds for the functionally ill, which again may be a local problem.Functional patients will always require in patient services while one could argue that the long term care of dementia need not, or should not, be in a hospital ward.We no longer have long-stay dementia beds and it seems highly likely that all areas will find their long-term care beds being dismantled.Our con cern is that while we pursue a largely futile case for more long-term dementia beds, the problem of acute functional illness may be forgotten.Functional illness remains more prevalent than dementia, active psychogeriatric services generate increased demand for in-patient treatment for func tional illness (Joint Colleges' Report, 1989) and the ‘¿ graduate' population in the community continues to increase.This will inevitably drift into the psycho geriatric domain and may prove a considerable drain on resources.Itwillbe a mistake to underestimate the future demands of functional illness in old age.

Key findings

Why it matters

This commentary discusses the difficulty of providing in-patient beds for functionally ill older people and argues that long-term dementia care need not be in a hospital ward. It warns that focusing on long-term dementia beds may cause the problem of acute functional illness to be forgotten.

Study details

How this study scored 27/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 26 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 27 of 100. Total 27 of 100.26 of the 96 points we could judge = 27 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 26 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 27 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The British Journal of Psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 The British Journal of Psychiatry: journal h-index 376 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1991 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.1 citations a year over 37 year(s) since 1991
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Prakash Naik holds only 5 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Queen's Medical Centre: institution h-index 517 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 26 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 27 out of 100.
Total 27 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Naik, P. (1991). How old are the elderly? The British Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000108700

Vancouver

Naik P. How old are the elderly? The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1991. doi:10.1192/s0007125000108700.

BibTeX

@article{naik1991-8334975f,
  author  = {Naik, Prakash},
  title   = {{How old are the elderly?}},
  journal = {The British Journal of Psychiatry},
  year    = {1991},
  doi     = {10.1192/s0007125000108700},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1192/s0007125000108700}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “delirium”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “delirium”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →