Home › Research › Health systems and care delivery
Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare
Lauren Hersch Nicholas, Stacy M. Fischer, Alicia I. Arbaje, Marcelo Coca Perraillon, Christine DeLong Jones, Daniel E. Polsky. JAMA Health Forum, 2024-07-19
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Receipt of potentially burdensome hospitalizations and treatments; receipt of postdischarge home and facility care. The study included 659 135 TM enrollees (mean [SD] age at death, 83.3 [9.0] years, 54% female, 15.1% non-White, 55% with 1 or more life-limiting condition) and 360 430 MA enrollees (mean [SD] age at death 82.5 [8.7] years, 53% female, 19.3% non-White, 49% with 1 or more life-limiting condition). After regression adjustment, MA enrollees were less likely to receive potentially burdensome treatments (-1.6 percentage points (pp); 95% CI, -2.1 to -1.1) and less likely to die in a hospital (-3.3 pp; 95% CI, -4.0 to -2.7) compared with TM. However, when hospitalized, MA enrollees were more likely to die in the hospital (adjusted difference, 1.3 pp; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5) and less likely to be transferred to rehabilitative or skilled nursing facilities (-5.2 pp; 95% CI, -5.7 to -4.6). Higher rates of home health and home hospice among those discharged home offset half of the decline in facility use. Results were unchanged in the life-limiting conditions sample. MA enrollment was associated with lower rates of potentially burdensome and facility-based care near the EOL. Greater use of home-based care may improve quality of care but may also leave patients without adequate assistance after hospitalization.
Key findings
- Receipt of potentially burdensome hospitalizations and treatments; receipt of postdischarge home and facility care.
- The study included 659 135 TM enrollees (mean [SD] age at death, 83.3 [9.0] years, 54% female, 15.1% non-White, 55% with 1 or more life-limiting condition) and 360 430 MA enrollees (mean [SD] age at death 82.5 [8.7] years, 53% female, 19.3% non-White, 49% with 1 or more life-limiting condition).
- After regression adjustment, MA enrollees were less likely to receive potentially burdensome treatments (-1.6 percentage points (pp); 95% CI, -2.1 to -1.1) and less likely to die in a hospital (-3.3 pp; 95% CI, -4.0 to -2.7) compared with TM.
- However, when hospitalized, MA enrollees were more likely to die in the hospital (adjusted difference, 1.3 pp; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5) and less likely to be transferred to rehabilitative or skilled nursing facilities (-5.2 pp; 95% CI, -5.7 to -4.6).
- Higher rates of home health and home hospice among those discharged home offset half of the decline in facility use.
Why it matters
This study found that Medicare Advantage enrollees were less likely to receive potentially burdensome treatments and less likely to die in a hospital than traditional Medicare enrollees, but when hospitalized they were more likely to die in the hospital and less likely to be transferred to rehabilitative or skilled nursing facilities. Greater use of home-based care may improve quality of care but may also leave patients without adequate assistance after hospitalization.
Study details
- Participants659
- Effect size15.1%; 19.3%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 48/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (JAMA Health Forum) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | JAMA Health Forum: journal h-index 60 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 659 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 2 / 7 | Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 2.0 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 3.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 1 / 6 | Cited by 1 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Daniel E. Polsky: h-index 58 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39028655) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 48 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777
- PubMed: 39028655
- Original source →
- Free full text: JAMA Health Forum →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Nicholas, L. H., Fischer, S. M., Arbaje, A. I., Perraillon, M. C., Jones, C. D., & Polsky, D. E. (2024). Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare. JAMA Health Forum. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777
Vancouver
Nicholas LH, Fischer SM, Arbaje AI, Perraillon MC, Jones CD, Polsky DE. Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare. JAMA Health Forum. 2024. doi:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777. PMID: 39028655.
BibTeX
@article{nicholas2024-39028655,
author = {Nicholas, Lauren Hersch and Fischer, Stacy M. and Arbaje, Alicia I. and Perraillon, Marcelo Coca and Jones, Christine DeLong and Polsky, Daniel E.},
title = {{Medicare-Covered Services Near the End of Life in Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare}},
journal = {JAMA Health Forum},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777},
pmid = {39028655},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1777}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.