Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Frequencies of chromatid aberrations in response to G2-phase x-irradiation were compared in PHA-stimulated blood lymphocytes from healthy control subjects, Down syndrome (DS) patients, and Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. In cells arrested with Colcemid immediately (0-30 min) after x-irradiation, DS, AD, and control cells showed similar high frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps, representing unrepaired DNA strand breaks. Frequencies had decreased in AD and control cells arrested 30-90 min after irradiation. However, DS cells had two- to three-fold higher frequencies than AD or control cells. This result indicates deficient repair of the DNA damage in DS cells. Similar responses were obtained with lymphocytes from four of seven DS parents tested and with skin fibroblasts from DS patients compared to age-matched controls. Addition of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C), an inhibitor of the repair polymerase, after x-irradiation during G2 phase increased the frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps in lymphocytes from control and AD donors significantly more than in those from DS patients. This result indicates a deficiency in DS cells in incision at sites of x-ray-induced damage. Thus DS, like other cancer-prone genetic disorders, has a G2-phase DNA repair deficiency in strand break repair and also a second DNA repair deficiency in incision activity.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Sanford, K. K., Parshad, R., Price, F. M., Tarone, R. E., & Schapiro, M. B. (1993). X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8

Vancouver

Sanford KK, Parshad R, Price FM, Tarone RE, Schapiro MB. X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 1993. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8. PMID: 8221609.

BibTeX

@article{sanford1993-8221609,
  author  = {Sanford, K. K. and Parshad, R. and Price, F. M. and Tarone, R. E. and Schapiro, M. B.},
  title   = {{X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness}},
  journal = {Cancer genetics and cytogenetics},
  year    = {1993},
  doi     = {10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8},
  pmid    = {8221609},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This laboratory study found that cells from Down syndrome patients had deficient repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage compared to Alzheimer's disease and control cells. It describes a cellular difference but does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 36 of 100.36 of 100 points earned64 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cancer genetics and cytogenetics)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics: journal h-index 122 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1993 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 24 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 35 year(s) since 1993
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Mark B. Schapiro: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8221609)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Also tagged “down”

527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →