Home › Research › Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness
Sanford KK, Parshad R, Price FM, Tarone RE, Schapiro MB.. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics, 1993-10-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Frequencies of chromatid aberrations in response to G2-phase x-irradiation were compared in PHA-stimulated blood lymphocytes from healthy control subjects, Down syndrome (DS) patients, and Alzheimer disease (AD) patients. In cells arrested with Colcemid immediately (0-30 min) after x-irradiation, DS, AD, and control cells showed similar high frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps, representing unrepaired DNA strand breaks. Frequencies had decreased in AD and control cells arrested 30-90 min after irradiation. However, DS cells had two- to three-fold higher frequencies than AD or control cells. This result indicates deficient repair of the DNA damage in DS cells. Similar responses were obtained with lymphocytes from four of seven DS parents tested and with skin fibroblasts from DS patients compared to age-matched controls. Addition of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C), an inhibitor of the repair polymerase, after x-irradiation during G2 phase increased the frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps in lymphocytes from control and AD donors significantly more than in those from DS patients. This result indicates a deficiency in DS cells in incision at sites of x-ray-induced damage. Thus DS, like other cancer-prone genetic disorders, has a G2-phase DNA repair deficiency in strand break repair and also a second DNA repair deficiency in incision activity.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Sanford, K. K., Parshad, R., Price, F. M., Tarone, R. E., & Schapiro, M. B. (1993). X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8
Vancouver
Sanford KK, Parshad R, Price FM, Tarone RE, Schapiro MB. X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness. Cancer genetics and cytogenetics. 1993. doi:10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8. PMID: 8221609.
BibTeX
@article{sanford1993-8221609,
author = {Sanford, K. K. and Parshad, R. and Price, F. M. and Tarone, R. E. and Schapiro, M. B.},
title = {{X-ray-induced chromatid damage in cells from Down syndrome and Alzheimer disease patients in relation to DNA repair and cancer proneness}},
journal = {Cancer genetics and cytogenetics},
year = {1993},
doi = {10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8},
pmid = {8221609},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(93)90127-8}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- This result indicates deficient repair of the DNA damage in DS cells.
- Similar responses were obtained with lymphocytes from four of seven DS parents tested and with skin fibroblasts from DS patients compared to age-matched controls.
- Addition of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C), an inhibitor of the repair polymerase, after x-irradiation during G2 phase increased the frequencies of chromatid breaks and gaps in lymphocytes from control and AD donors significantly more than in those from DS patients.
- This result indicates a deficiency in DS cells in incision at sites of x-ray-induced damage.
Why it matters
This laboratory study found that cells from Down syndrome patients had deficient repair of X-ray-induced DNA damage compared to Alzheimer's disease and control cells. It describes a cellular difference but does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Cancer genetics and cytogenetics) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics: journal h-index 122 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1993 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 3 / 7 | Cited 24 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.7 citations a year over 35 year(s) since 1993 |
| Impact for its field and year | 1 / 6 | Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 3 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Mark B. Schapiro: h-index 56 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 3 / 3 | National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 8221609) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's
Also tagged “down”
527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.