Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

To explore changes in performance, weaknesses, and utilization of the long-term care (LTC) system for older people with disabilities and dementia (OPWDD) in Zhejiang Province, China, thereby providing a reference for decision-making amid a progressively aging population. A performance evaluation model of the LTC system for OPWDD was constructed using three dimensions: input, process, and outcome. Performance indicators and trends were calculated based on data collected from statistical yearbooks, documents, and work reports of the Bureau of Statistics and other government departments in Zhejiang Province, China, published in 2015-2021. Significant improvements were observed in most LTC performance indicators for OPWDD, such as input, process, and outcome, with notable enhancements in fairness, accessibility, and affordability of LTC services. By 2021, there were 6.20 nursing and rehabilitation beds in medical institutions and 3.77 general practitioners per 1,000 people aged 65 and above, up 144.14% and 13.73%, respectively, from 2015. The rate of health management for older people was 70.91%, representing a 10.33% increase from 2015. The actual reimbursement ratio of hospitalization expenses covered by basic medical insurance for older people rose 7.05%, from 72.76% in 2015 to 77.89% in 2021. Social security satisfaction rose 12.4%, from 71.3% in 2015 to 83.7% in 2021. Certain indicators, however, showed no significant improvement and tended to decline, such as the number of beds at older care institutions and caregivers per 1,000 people aged 65 and over. It is imperative to further balance the allocation of care resources, using a people-centered and integrated LTC system. The proportion of rehabilitation and nursing beds for older people should be consistently increased to effectively alleviate the shortage of care beds. Furthermore, a talent incentive policy should be improved to train caregivers and provide whole-person and whole-life course care based on OPWDD needs.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Tongda, S., Xiuli, L., Wenyin, J., Xiaoxin, D., Minmin, J., & Lu, L. (2023). Utilization and performance of long-term care system for older people with disabilities and dementia in Zhejiang Province, China. Frontiers in psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148682

Vancouver

Tongda S, Xiuli L, Wenyin J, Xiaoxin D, Minmin J, Lu L. Utilization and performance of long-term care system for older people with disabilities and dementia in Zhejiang Province, China. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2023. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148682. PMID: 37032916.

BibTeX

@article{tongda2023-37032916,
  author  = {Tongda, Sun and Xiuli, Liu and Wenyin, Jiang and Xiaoxin, Dong and Minmin, Jiang and Lu, Li},
  title   = {{Utilization and performance of long-term care system for older people with disabilities and dementia in Zhejiang Province, China}},
  journal = {Frontiers in psychiatry},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148682},
  pmid    = {37032916},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1148682}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study evaluated the long-term care system for older people with disabilities and dementia in one Chinese province and found improvements in most performance indicators, though some declined. It is about care system performance, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 39/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 39 of 100.39 of 100 points earned61 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in psychiatry)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Psychiatry: journal h-index 194 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,000 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.4 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 4 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Lu Li: h-index 14 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Zhejiang Shuren University: institution h-index 116 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 37032916)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 39 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →