Home › Research › Digital health tools
Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia
Meiland FJ, Bouman AI, Sävenstedt S, Bentvelzen S, Davies RJ, Mulvenna MD, Nugent CD, Moelaert F et al.. Aging & mental health, 2012-02-24
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Objective To evaluate a newly developed integrated digital prosthetic, the COGKNOW Day Navigator (CDN), to support persons with mild dementia in their daily lives, with memory, social contacts, daily activities and safety. Methods A user participatory method was applied in the development process, which consisted of three iterative 1-year cycles with field tests in Amsterdam, Belfast and Luleå. In the successive cycles 16, 14 and 12 persons with dementia and their carers participated. Data on usability were collected by means of interviews, observations, questionnaires, logging and diaries. The CDN prototype consists of a touch screen, a mobile device, sensors and actuators. Results The evaluation showed that persons with dementia and carers valued the CDN overall as user-friendly and useful. Conclusions regarding the effectiveness of the system in daily life were limited due to insufficient duration of the testing period caused by delays in development and some instability of the final prototype. Conclusion With the suggested adaptations, the CDN is expected to be a useful tool for supporting community-dwelling persons with mild dementia and their carers.
Key findings
- Results The evaluation showed that persons with dementia and carers valued the CDN overall as user-friendly and useful.
Why it matters
People with mild dementia living at home and their carers helped design and test the COGKNOW Day Navigator, a touch-screen, mobile and sensor system meant to support memory, social contact, daily activities and safety, over three yearly test rounds in Amsterdam, Belfast and Luleå (16, 14 and 12 people with dementia in turn). Participants rated it "overall as user-friendly and useful". The authors say they could not judge whether it actually helps in daily life, because testing was cut short by development delays and "some instability of the final prototype".
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Participants12
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 46/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Aging & mental health) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Aging & Mental Health: journal h-index 153 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2012 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 12 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 4 / 7 | Cited 94 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 2 / 5 | 5.9 citations a year over 16 year(s) since 2012 |
| Impact for its field and year | 4 / 6 | Cited 8.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 6 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 6 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 3 / 4 | Last-listed author Rose‐Marie Dröes: h-index 55 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam: institution h-index 938 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 8 institution(s) in 4 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22360649) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Total | 46 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Meiland, F. J., Bouman, A. I., Sävenstedt, S., Bentvelzen, S., Davies, R. J., Mulvenna, M. D., et al. (2012). Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia. Aging & mental health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.651433
Vancouver
Meiland FJ, Bouman AI, Sävenstedt S, Bentvelzen S, Davies RJ, Mulvenna MD, et al. Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia. Aging & mental health. 2012. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.651433. PMID: 22360649.
BibTeX
@article{meiland2012-22360649,
author = {Meiland, F. J. and Bouman, A. I. and Sävenstedt, S. and Bentvelzen, S. and Davies, R. J. and Mulvenna, M. D. and Nugent, C. D. and Moelaert, F. and others},
title = {{Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia}},
journal = {Aging \& mental health},
year = {2012},
doi = {10.1080/13607863.2011.651433},
pmid = {22360649},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2011.651433}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also tagged “assessment”
840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.