Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Transthyretin amyloidosis: a new mutation associated with dementia
Petersen RB, Goren H, Cohen M, Richardson SL, Tresser N, Lynn A, Gali M, Estes M et al.. Annals of neurology, 1997-03-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Familial transthyretin (TTR) amyloidosis commonly presents with peripheral neuropathy and involvement of visceral organs. In contrast, signs of central nervous system (CNS) involvement are exceptional. We report that members of a kindred affected by a slowly progressive dementia, seizures, ataxia, hemiparesis, and decreased vision without neuropathy have TTR amyloid deposits in the leptomeninges, the brain parenchyma, and the eye. This condition, previously labeled oculoleptomeningeal amyloidosis, is linked to a mutation at codon 30 of TTR gene, resulting in the substitution of valine with glycine in this family, TTR amyloid deposits were present in the leptomeninges, especially the leptomeningeal vessels, and in the subependymal regions of the ventricular system where they disrupted the ependymal lining and resulted in amyloid-glial formations protruding into and narrowing the ventricular system. Hydrocephalus and atrophy and infarction of cerebral and cerebellar cortexes were also present. Review of the literature shows that amyloid deposition in the leptomeninges is not uncommon in TTR amyloidoses clinically characterized by peripheral neuropathy and lack of CNS signs. The present kindred, which presented exclusively with signs of CNS involvement, expands the phenotype of TTR amyloidosis and raises questions concerning the mechanisms determining phenotypic expression in TTR familial amyloidosis.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Petersen, R. B., Goren, H., Cohen, M., Richardson, S. L., Tresser, N., Lynn, A., et al. (1997). Transthyretin amyloidosis: a new mutation associated with dementia. Annals of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410410305
Vancouver
Petersen RB, Goren H, Cohen M, Richardson SL, Tresser N, Lynn A, et al. Transthyretin amyloidosis: a new mutation associated with dementia. Annals of neurology. 1997. doi:10.1002/ana.410410305. PMID: 9066351.
BibTeX
@article{petersen1997-9066351,
author = {Petersen, R. B. and Goren, H. and Cohen, M. and Richardson, S. L. and Tresser, N. and Lynn, A. and Gali, M. and Estes, M. and others},
title = {{Transthyretin amyloidosis: a new mutation associated with dementia}},
journal = {Annals of neurology},
year = {1997},
doi = {10.1002/ana.410410305},
pmid = {9066351},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410410305}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- We report that members of a kindred affected by a slowly progressive dementia, seizures, ataxia, hemiparesis, and decreased vision without neuropathy have TTR amyloid deposits in the leptomeninges, the brain parenchyma, and the eye.
- This condition, previously labeled oculoleptomeningeal amyloidosis, is linked to a mutation at codon 30 of TTR gene, resulting in the substitution of valine with glycine in this family, TTR amyloid deposits were present in the leptomeninges, especially the leptomeningeal vessels, and in the subependymal regions of the ventricular system where they disrupted the ependymal lining and resulted in amyloid-glial formations protruding into and narrowing the ventricular system.
- Hydrocephalus and atrophy and infarction of cerebral and cerebellar cortexes were also present.
- Review of the literature shows that amyloid deposition in the leptomeninges is not uncommon in TTR amyloidoses clinically characterized by peripheral neuropathy and lack of CNS signs.
- The present kindred, which presented exclusively with signs of CNS involvement, expands the phenotype of TTR amyloidosis and raises questions concerning the mechanisms determining phenotypic expression in TTR familial amyloidosis.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1997 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 9066351) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.