Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet

Animal models provide consistency and validity of research results from in vitro studies or studies with rodents. As shown in Figure 1, the number of publications per year on zebrafish as a model for biomedical research has been significantly increasing in recent years. In the laboratory, to get reasonable research results, zebrafish should receive the appropriate type and level of dietary nutrients. Most of the time researchers use different commercial diets for zebrafish, but several commercial diets have undefined nutritional composition and may have an effect on experimental results (Gonzales and Law, 2013). In research studies, it is important to use a standard diet with adequate nutritional composition and known ingredients, which promote optimum growth and physiological status of the fish and to minimize the contribution of unintended nutritional effects on experimental results. The following diet formulas (Tables 1 and 2) were developed in our laboratory and give consistent experimental results with zebrafish. Disturbance of the normal process of converting food to energy in the cell results in different metabolic disorders. A report from World Health Organization indicated that, of the metabolism-related human diseases, cardiovascular disease is currently the most predominant fatal disease (Lozano et al., 2012). The between and type 2 diabetes was developed by et al. and that young zebrafish to mo developed than zebrafish with increasing of The concentration of homeostasis organs can be increased by zebrafish embryos in a et al. showed that of adult zebrafish in a for hr increase blood up to 400 The transgenic models of insulin established by et al. were skeletal muscle insulin by transgenic expression of a in skeletal In the model, insulin was of the insulin gene using CRISPR/Cas9 et al., 2015). These results that zebrafish are a suitable model to study human disease. et al. also developed a zebrafish model for by human insulin in zebrafish These studies of the type in research results of et al. showed that mutant zebrafish with a in insulin a and genes when fed a diet showed growth increased and fatty liver development, which are similar to the human disease. The changes showed by zebrafish fed a high level of are very similar with the shown in human and 2012). of a diet is also important for the study of et al., et al. lipid and metabolism using the zebrafish embryo metabolism stages and that of fatty the system was dependent on production in t

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Teame, T., Zhang, Z., Ran, C., Zhang, H., Yang, Y., Ding, Q., et al. (2019). The use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) as biomedical models. Animal Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz020

Vancouver

Teame T, Zhang Z, Ran C, Zhang H, Yang Y, Ding Q, et al. The use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) as biomedical models. Animal Frontiers. 2019. doi:10.1093/af/vfz020. PMID: 32002264.

BibTeX

@article{teame2019-32002264,
  author  = {Teame, Tsegay and Zhang, Zhen and Ran, Chao and Zhang, Hongling and Yang, Yalin and Ding, Qianwen and Xie, Minxu and Gao, Chenchen and others},
  title   = {{The use of zebrafish (Danio rerio) as biomedical models}},
  journal = {Animal Frontiers},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1093/af/vfz020},
  pmid    = {32002264},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz020}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 24 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 41 of 100. Total 41 of 100.24 of the 58 points we could judge = 41 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Animal Frontiers)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “zebrafish”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32002264)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 24 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100.
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also in Disease mechanisms

128 studies in the library are filed under Disease mechanisms with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Disease mechanisms hub.

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →