Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer disease (AD) is the most common dementing disorder, affecting 55 million people worldwide. Brain MRI plays an integral role in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with cognitive symptoms. When interpreting brain MRI for cognitive impairment, radiologists should assess the following four key features: (1) white matter ischemic burden, (2) structural changes to suggest normal pressure hydrocephalus, (3) locoregional pattern of brain atrophy, and (4) presence of microhemorrhage or superficial siderosis, particularly for determining eligibility for anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody (MAB) treatment when appropriate. The recent approval and clinical adoption of anti-amyloid MAB expanded the role of neuroradiologists in evaluating eligibility and monitoring ARIA (amyloid-related imaging abnormality) among patients receiving anti-amyloid MAB. This advancement underscores the importance of standardized imaging protocols and effective communication between neuroradiologists and cognitive neurologists. Depending on the severity of ARIA and patients' symptoms, treatment may need to be suspended or discontinued. This review article explores brain MRI and FDG-PET/CT imaging abnormalities in patients with major cognitive and movement disorders associated with dementia. It aims to assist radiologists in providing differential diagnoses within a clinical context. Finally, the article emphasizes the importance of recognizing co-pathologies, since patients may have more than one neurodegenerative disease rather than viewing these neurodegenerative diseases as being mutually exclusive. KEY POINTS: Question Traditional regional patterns of brain atrophy on MRI by neuroradiologists may not be effective given the recent advances in understanding of neurodegenerative disease and recognition of co-pathologies. Findings The locoregional atrophy and the patterns of metabolic abnormality help in the differential diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. Remember that brain MRI determines eligibility for anti-amyloid immunotherapy. Clinical relevance Understanding clinical history is vital for interpreting brain MRI for patients with cognitive impairment or memory loss. Newly recognized entities such as limbic-predominant age-related TDP43 encephalopathy (LATE) can mimic Alzheimer disease among extremely elderly patients with amnestic symptoms with mesial temporal lobe atrophy.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes how brain MRI is used to assess features such as microhemorrhage or superficial siderosis, particularly when determining eligibility for anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody treatment. It notes that depending on ARIA severity and symptoms, treatment may need to be suspended or discontinued, and stresses standardized imaging protocols and communication between neuroradiologists and cognitive neurologists.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (European Radiology)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 European Radiology: journal h-index 211 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Satoshi Minoshima: h-index 89 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Utah: institution h-index 1,238 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40903623)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Anzai, Y., & Minoshima, S. (2025). The role of brain MR and FDG-PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11940-3

Vancouver

Anzai Y, Minoshima S. The role of brain MR and FDG-PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease. European Radiology. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00330-025-11940-3. PMID: 40903623.

BibTeX

@article{anzai2025-40903623,
  author  = {Anzai, Yoshimi and Minoshima, Satoshi},
  title   = {{The role of brain MR and FDG-PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative disease}},
  journal = {European Radiology},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s00330-025-11940-3},
  pmid    = {40903623},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11940-3}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →