Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment

Objective We hypothesized that among community-dwelling older adults without dementia with advanced chronic knee osteoarthritis (OA) pain: 1) higher levels of self-reported pain would be associated with decreased executive cognitive function and decreased physical function; and 2) decreased cognitive function would be associated with decreased physical function. Methods Substudy on 79 older adults who were participants in a Veterans Affairs clinical trial of periosteal stimulation therapy for advanced painful knee OA. Participants were ≥ 60 years, had radiographic evidence of Kellgren-Lawrence 3 or 4 knee OA on a standing anterior-posterior X-ray, had pain of at least moderate intensity and of at least 3 months' duration, and knee pain severity greater than pain severity in other parts of the body. Measures included computerized cognitive tests of executive function, pain, and physical function (gait speed and stair climbing). Results As pain scores worsened, gait speed and stair climbing worsened (P = 0.007 and P = 0.035, respectively). Lower performance on the executive function tests was also significantly associated with decreased gait speed and stair climbing (P = 0.002 and P = 0.014, respectively). We did not find a significant relationship between pain and cognitive function. We explored the relationship between pain and physical function adjusted for executive functioning and found that pain was no longer associated with gait speed (P = 0.06). Conclusion Worse pain scores and executive function scores were associated with worse physical function in older adults with painful knee OA. This suggests that slower gait speed in patients could be an indication to clinicians to monitor their patient's cognitive function. Executive function in particular affected the relationship between gait speed and pain, suggesting a possible mediating relationship.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 21 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 36 of 100. Total 36 of 100.21 of the 58 points we could judge = 36 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2014 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 25040845)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 21 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Morone, N. E., Abebe, K. Z., Morrow, L. A., & Weiner, D. K. (2014). Pain and decreased cognitive function negatively impact physical functioning in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12483

Vancouver

Morone NE, Abebe KZ, Morrow LA, Weiner DK. Pain and decreased cognitive function negatively impact physical functioning in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2014. doi:10.1111/pme.12483. PMID: 25040845.

BibTeX

@article{morone2014-25040845,
  author  = {Morone, N. E. and Abebe, K. Z. and Morrow, L. A. and Weiner, D. K.},
  title   = {{Pain and decreased cognitive function negatively impact physical functioning in older adults with knee osteoarthritis}},
  journal = {Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)},
  year    = {2014},
  doi     = {10.1111/pme.12483},
  pmid    = {25040845},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/pme.12483}
}

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →