Home › Research › Risk factors
Tauopathy and cognitive impairment in experimental diabetes mellitus
Mariia V. Matveeva, Yulia G. SamoiIova, Natalia G. Zhukova, Oksana A. Oleynik, Maria A. Rotkank. Diabetes mellitus, 2017-08-10
Topic: Disease mechanisms in lab and animal studies
Currently, diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common metabolic disorder, which is manifested by hyperglycemia and leads to vascular and cognitive impairment. Mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction in patients with DM remain highly unclear, thus complicating the search for effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of dementia. Recently, scientists have discussed the issues regarding the relationship between DM and Alzheimers disease (AD), such as risk factors that trigger the cascade of pathological reactions. Patients with DM show an increased risk of developing AD. Similarly, patients with AD have been shown to have impaired insulin and glucose metabolism. Both these diseases have common nosology, pathology and biochemical basics, including oxidative stress, formation of advanced glycation end products, dysregulation of glucose metabolism and altered insulin signaling pathways. The microtubule-associated tau protein is involved in one of the causative mechanisms underlying the development of AD. We provide an overview of the major domestic and foreign data analyses regarding tau protein and the development of cognitive disorders in experimental DM.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Matveeva, M. V., SamoiIova, Y. G., Zhukova, N. G., Oleynik, O. A., & Rotkank, M. A. (2017). Tauopathy and cognitive impairment in experimental diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5842
Vancouver
Matveeva MV, SamoiIova YG, Zhukova NG, Oleynik OA, Rotkank MA. Tauopathy and cognitive impairment in experimental diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus. 2017. doi:10.14341/2072-0351-5842.
BibTeX
@article{matveeva2017-73aeeded,
author = {Matveeva, Mariia V. and SamoiIova, Yulia G. and Zhukova, Natalia G. and Oleynik, Oksana A. and Rotkank, Maria A.},
title = {{Tauopathy and cognitive impairment in experimental diabetes mellitus}},
journal = {Diabetes mellitus},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.14341/2072-0351-5842},
url = {https://doi.org/10.14341/2072-0351-5842}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Patients with DM show an increased risk of developing AD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 38/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Diabetes mellitus) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2017 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 21 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100. |
| Total | 38 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Risk factors
Also tagged “phosphorylation”
389 studies in the library carry the topic tag “phosphorylation”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 389 tagged studies.