Home › Research › Drug development
tau kinases in the rat heat shock model: possible implications for Alzheimer disease
Shanavas A, Papasozomenos SC.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2000-12-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
We have previously shown, by using the phosphate-dependent anti-tau antibodies Tau-1 and PHF-1, that heat shock induces rapid dephosphorylation of tau followed by hyperphosphorylation in female rats. In this study, we analyzed in forebrain homogenates from female Sprague-Dawley rats the activities of extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase (JNK), glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3beta), cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk5), cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA), and Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) at 0 (n = 5), 3 (n = 4), 6 (n = 5), and 12 (n = 5) h after heat shock and in non-heat-shocked controls (n = 5). Immunoprecipitation kinase assays at 0 h showed suppression of the activities of all kinases except of GSK-3beta, which showed increased activity. At 3-6 h, the activities of ERK1/2, JNK, Cdk5, and GSK-3beta toward selective substrates were increased; however, only JNK, Cdk5, and GSK-3beta but not ERK1/2 were overactivated toward purified bovine tau. At 3-6 h, kinase assays specific for PKA and CaMKII showed no increased activity toward either tau or selective substrates. All of eight anti-tau antibodies tested showed dephosphorylation at 0 h and hyperphosphorylation at 3-6 h, except for 12E8, which showed hyperphosphorylation also at 0 h. Immunoblot analysis using activity-dependent antibodies against ERK1/2, JNK, and GSK-3beta confirmed the above data. Increased activation and inhibition of kinases after heat shock were statistically significant in comparison with controls. Because tau is hyperphosphorylated in Alzheimer disease these findings suggest that JNK, GSK-3beta, and Cdk5 may play a role in its pathogenesis.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Shanavas, A., & Papasozomenos, S. C. (2000). tau kinases in the rat heat shock model: possible implications for Alzheimer disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14139
Vancouver
Shanavas A, Papasozomenos SC. tau kinases in the rat heat shock model: possible implications for Alzheimer disease. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.26.14139. PMID: 11121021.
BibTeX
@article{shanavas2000-11121021,
author = {Shanavas, A. and Papasozomenos, S. C.},
title = {{tau kinases in the rat heat shock model: possible implications for Alzheimer disease}},
journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
year = {2000},
doi = {10.1073/pnas.97.26.14139},
pmid = {11121021},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.26.14139}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Increased activation and inhibition of kinases after heat shock were statistically significant in comparison with controls.
- Because tau is hyperphosphorylated in Alzheimer disease these findings suggest that JNK, GSK-3beta, and Cdk5 may play a role in its pathogenesis.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2000 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “rat”) — scores zero |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 11121021) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Drug development
Also tagged “tau”
7 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tau”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 7 tagged studies.