Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet

Plain-language summary

Background Vascular dementia (VaD) is a major subtype of dementia caused by cerebrovascular disease, with complex pathogenesis involving oxidative stress, calcium dyshomeostasis, and iron-dependent ferroptosis. Excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) promote Ca 2+ influx via TRPM2 channels, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and neuronal injury, while iron accumulation accelerates lipid peroxidation. The Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 axis is a key antioxidant pathway that suppresses ferroptosis. Although spermine exhibits neuroprotective properties, its role in VaD and ferroptosis remains insufficiently defined. Methods and Results A modified two-vessel occlusion (2-VO) model was established in Sprague-Dawley rats, followed by spermine administration (150 mg/kg/day). Cognitive function was assessed using the Morris water maze. Histological and ultrastructural changes were evaluated by HE, Nissl staining, and transmission electron microscopy. Oxidative stress markers (ROS, MDA, GSH, SOD, Fe 2+ ) and protein expression (TRPM2, Nrf2, SLC7A11, GPX4) were analyzed by biochemical assays, Western blot, immunohistochemistry, and immunofluorescence. In vitro, SH-SY5Y cells subjected to OGD/R were treated with spermidine (1.4 µg/mL). VaD rats and OGD/R-treated cells exhibited cognitive deficits, neuronal damage, mitochondrial dysfunction, increased TRPM2 expression, decreased Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 levels, and enhanced oxidative stress and ferroptosis. Spermine significantly improved cognitive performance, alleviated neuronal and mitochondrial injury, suppressed TRPM2 expression, restored Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 signaling, and reduced oxidative stress and ferroptosis. Conclusion Spermine exerts neuroprotective effects in VaD by inhibiting TRPM2-mediated oxidative stress and activating the Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 pathway, thereby suppressing ferroptosis. These findings highlight spermine as a promising therapeutic candidate targeting ferroptosis in vascular dementia.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Wang, H., Wang, Y., Xie, Y., Liu, P., Zhao, M., Hao, R., et al. (2026). Spermine inhibits ferroptosis in vascular dementia rats by intervening Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 expression in chondriosome. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11156074/v1

Vancouver

Wang H, Wang Y, Xie Y, Liu P, Zhao M, Hao R, et al. Spermine inhibits ferroptosis in vascular dementia rats by intervening Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 expression in chondriosome. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11156074/v1.

BibTeX

@article{wang2026-88551104,
  author  = {Wang, H. and Wang, Y. and Xie, Y. and Liu, P. and Zhao, M. and Hao, R. and Zhang, H. and Li, P.},
  title   = {{Spermine inhibits ferroptosis in vascular dementia rats by intervening Nrf2/SLC7A11/GPX4 expression in chondriosome}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11156074/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11156074/v1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 13 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 21 of 100. Raw total 21 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 21 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 21 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 21 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “rats”) — scores zero
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 13 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 13 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 21 out of 100.
Total 21 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Vascular contributions from nearby years

Also tagged “oxidative”

275 studies in the library carry the topic tag “oxidative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 275 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →