Home › Research › Biomarkers
Sensitivity-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Detection of Structural Differences and Unique Polymorphs in Pico- to Nanomolar Amounts of Brain-Derived and Synthetic 42-Residue Amyloid-β Fibrils
Wickramasinghe A, Xiao Y, Kobayashi N, Wang S, Scherpelz KP, Yamazaki T, Meredith SC, Ishii Y.. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2021-07-26
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Amyloid-β (Aβ) fibrils in neuritic plaques are a hallmark of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Since the 42-residue Aβ (Aβ42) fibril is the most pathogenic among different Aβ species, its structural characterization is crucial to our understanding of AD. While several polymorphs have been reported for Aβ40, previous studies of Aβ42 fibrils prepared at neutral pH detected essentially only one structure, with an S-shaped β-sheet arrangement ( e.g. , Xiao et al. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2015, 22, 499). Herein, we demonstrate the feasibility of characterizing the structure of trace amounts of brain-derived and synthetic amyloid fibrils by sensitivity-enhanced 1 H-detected solid-state NMR (SSNMR) under ultrafast magic angle spinning. By taking advantage of the high sensitivity of this technique, we first demonstrate its applicability for the high-throughput screening of trace amounts of selectively 13 C- and 15 N-labeled Aβ42 fibril prepared with ∼0.01% patient-derived amyloid ( ca . 4 pmol) as a seed. The comparison of 2D 13 C/ 1 H SSNMR data revealed marked structural differences between AD-derived Aβ42 (∼40 nmol or ∼200 μg) and synthetic fibrils in less than 10 min, confirming the feasibility of assessing the fibril structure from ∼1 pmol of brain amyloid seed in ∼2.5 h. We also present the first structural characterization of synthetic fully protonated Aβ42 fibril by 1 H-detected 3D and 4D SSNMR. With procedures assisted by automated assignments, main-chain resonance assignments were completed for trace amounts (∼42 nmol) of a fully protonated amyloid fibril in the 1 H-detection approach. The results suggest that this Aβ42 fibril exhibits a novel fold or polymorph structure.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Wickramasinghe, A., Xiao, Y., Kobayashi, N., Wang, S., Scherpelz, K. P., Yamazaki, T., et al. (2021). Sensitivity-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Detection of Structural Differences and Unique Polymorphs in Pico- to Nanomolar Amounts of Brain-Derived and Synthetic 42-Residue Amyloid-β Fibrils. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c03346
Vancouver
Wickramasinghe A, Xiao Y, Kobayashi N, Wang S, Scherpelz KP, Yamazaki T, et al. Sensitivity-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Detection of Structural Differences and Unique Polymorphs in Pico- to Nanomolar Amounts of Brain-Derived and Synthetic 42-Residue Amyloid-β Fibrils. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2021. doi:10.1021/jacs.1c03346. PMID: 34308630.
BibTeX
@article{wickramasinghe2021-34308630,
author = {Wickramasinghe, A. and Xiao, Y. and Kobayashi, N. and Wang, S. and Scherpelz, K. P. and Yamazaki, T. and Meredith, S. C. and Ishii, Y.},
title = {{Sensitivity-Enhanced Solid-State NMR Detection of Structural Differences and Unique Polymorphs in Pico- to Nanomolar Amounts of Brain-Derived and Synthetic 42-Residue Amyloid-β Fibrils}},
journal = {Journal of the American Chemical Society},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1021/jacs.1c03346},
pmid = {34308630},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c03346}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- The comparison of 2D 13 C/ 1 H SSNMR data revealed marked structural differences between AD-derived Aβ42 (∼40 nmol or ∼200 μg) and synthetic fibrils in less than 10 min, confirming the feasibility of assessing the fibril structure from ∼1 pmol of brain amyloid seed in ∼2.5 h.
- The results suggest that this Aβ42 fibril exhibits a novel fold or polymorph structure.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Blood tests & biomarkers →
Study details
- Effect size0.01%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Chemical Society) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34308630) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 25 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Biomarkers
Also in Biomarkers
224 studies in the library are filed under Biomarkers with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Biomarkers hub.