Home › Research › Treatments
Second-generation anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease: current landscape and future perspectives
Kim BH, Kim S, Nam Y, Park YH, Shin SM, Moon M.. Translational neurodegeneration, 2025-01-27
Topic: Drug trials: efficacy and safety
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia. Monoclonal antibodies (MABs) serve as a promising therapeutic approach for AD by selectively targeting key pathogenic factors, such as amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, tau protein, and neuroinflammation. Specifically, based on their efficacy in removing Aβ plaques from the brains of patients with AD, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved three anti-amyloid MABs, aducanumab (Aduhelm®), lecanemab (Leqembi®), and donanemab (Kisunla™). Notably, lecanemab received traditional approval after demonstrating clinical benefit, supporting the Aβ cascade hypothesis. These MABs targeting Aβ are categorized based on their affinity to diverse conformational features of Aβ, including monomer, fibril, protofibril, and plaque forms of Aβ as well as pyroglutamate Aβ. First-generation MABs targeting the non-toxic monomeric Aβ, such as solanezumab, bapineuzumab, and crenezumab, failed to demonstrate clinical benefit for AD in clinical trials. In contrast, second-generation MABs, including aducanumab, lecanemab, donanemab, and gantenerumab directed against pathogenic Aβ species and aggregates have shown that reducing Aβ deposition can be an effective strategy to slow cognitive impairment in AD. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current status, mechanisms, outcomes, and limitations of second-generation MABs for the clinical treatment of AD. Moreover, we discuss the perspectives and future directions of anti-amyloid MABs in the treatment of AD.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Kim, B. H., Kim, S., Nam, Y., Park, Y. H., Shin, S. M., & Moon, M. (2025). Second-generation anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease: current landscape and future perspectives. Translational neurodegeneration. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-025-00465-w
Vancouver
Kim BH, Kim S, Nam Y, Park YH, Shin SM, Moon M. Second-generation anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease: current landscape and future perspectives. Translational neurodegeneration. 2025. doi:10.1186/s40035-025-00465-w. PMID: 39865265.
BibTeX
@article{kim2025-39865265,
author = {Kim, B. H. and Kim, S. and Nam, Y. and Park, Y. H. and Shin, S. M. and Moon, M.},
title = {{Second-generation anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease: current landscape and future perspectives}},
journal = {Translational neurodegeneration},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1186/s40035-025-00465-w},
pmid = {39865265},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40035-025-00465-w}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In contrast, second-generation MABs, including aducanumab, lecanemab, donanemab, and gantenerumab directed against pathogenic Aβ species and aggregates have shown that reducing Aβ deposition can be an effective strategy to slow cognitive impairment in AD.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 45/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Translational neurodegeneration) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39865265) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100. |
| Total | 45 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “monoclonal”
332 studies in the library carry the topic tag “monoclonal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 332 tagged studies.